|
Google Site Search | Get RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
Races of Interest *Detailed* Discussion of Races – Screen shots, decisions, post-mortems |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-13-2014, 02:17 PM | #1 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Loretto, Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,539
|
Aqu March 13 Race 1 (Form Example)
In reading about form cycles and + races etc. on recent threads I was able to get a good hit today. The favourite #5 seemed to me to be declining in form (lower total energy) and (higher median %) and didn't have as plus a race last race. It was in the mud but he has won in the mud before. Discarding #5 put me on #6. Worked well for me this time. Didn't get time to bet in the contest however. Plus I thought I would try out Snagit and so have 3 pictures below.
Pook |
03-13-2014, 02:47 PM | #2 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 624
|
Nice hit! Damn shame you couldn't get any money down.
In snagit the have a square that has a dropped shadow option which looks better on screen.
__________________
Terry |
03-13-2014, 06:57 PM | #3 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 207
|
Pook
Hi Pook,
We learn from this anyway! Thanks. DSL |
03-14-2014, 09:04 AM | #4 | |
Grade 1
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 106
|
Quote:
How did you come about using line 3? Best of last 3, comparable distance and class? Here's what I see on this horse. Last line: Not a comparable line because of the off track and not a comparable line because of the raise in class. It has a couple of reasons that we can go back a line looking for a + race. 2nd line: This might be the pace line. The horse is dropping in class from its last race. It is going back to a "state bred race". It is going to be in a race that is about 1/2 the claiming price of its maiden win. Still the race is an open state-bred 16K claimer. I would much prefer this line IF this was a s16 n2L. (State-bred 16k non-winners of 2 lifetime). Then it would be making a natural progression in its lifetime conditions. 3rd line: This is the line you chose. Notice the pace of race was 23.2 - 46.8 and the horse tired slightly from that effort. Line 2 he was able to wire his field with a slightly slower pace. That is the reason I would have chosen line 2 over line 3 for the pace line. Also, why do we want to go back off a + pace-line? Line 2 is a + pace-line. I would use that and hope you still would be able to use the #6 for betting purposes. But as a consistency factor in picking your contenders and pace-lines, I think line 2 would be the line to work with. Ray |
|
03-14-2014, 09:38 AM | #5 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Loretto, Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,539
|
Ray
To be honest I usually let RDSS choose the best line from the last 3 comparable. Sartin says to give the horse its best chance, mostly always from the last 3. Personally I don't delve too much into class levels etc. I think it would drive me nuts. The line chosen put #5 on top of 5 contenders based on the fulcrum. The #3 and the #5 I moved to secondary status because of what I saw as declining form as described. So regardless of line chosen the #5 would have ended in the same place. Even with the #5 left in I would have ignored his low odds and bet the #1A and #6. In looking at his last 4 lines in BL/BL against the other contenders I didn't find him so dominant as to want to pass. He did run 3rd however which was maybe better than I expected. Hope this explains my thinking but remember as with most others on here it is only IMHO. Pook |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Adjustments Question | Ted Craven | RDSS2 / FAQ's | 3 | 06-29-2014 03:22 PM |
Another paceless race - IMHO | Bill Lyster | Matchup Discussion | 12 | 01-31-2014 11:55 AM |
UPDATED - Official Contest Rules, beginning AUGUST | Ted Craven | August Contest | 1 | 07-24-2012 10:09 PM |
Daily Racing Form Abbreviated Race Conditions | For The Lead | Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum | 1 | 11-12-2009 03:15 AM |
Jim Bradshaw's 5 Step Approach to learning the Matchup | RichieP | Hat Check - How Can We Help You? | 1 | 05-25-2009 09:52 AM |