RDSS 2 For Wed 4/27

[Bill Lyster]

Originally Posted by Ted Craven

I'm not sure how many examples I want to post until I clarify the issues raised in my post here: http://paceandcap.com/forums/showpos...4&postcount=37

For example, despite the automated choices made below, and the poor Hi SR of the #4, perhaps it should be the #1 E horse because it has > 25% of the ES points AND is more than 5% above the 2nd E. In other words should it be:

4-3 / 7-2 (Early / Late) or
4-5 / 7-2 or
3-5 / 7/2 (as shown)

Attachment 21881

I'm sure folks appreciate that this is a pre-release work (not even quite Beta stage); and that some things are open to interpretation; and that I am attempting to automate not only numbers creation but a selection process (if not quite a wagering process).

None-the-less, it is great that I can get multiple eyes and minds critiquing this stuff and pointing out bugs and suggesting enhancements before the beginning. OK, maybe I'll put up a few more...

Ted

Ted in this Tam 1 example I think that the 4 gets dropped because the POR of 57 is greater than the high 54 of the 4 horse. My vote would be to leave, AS SHOWN.

Bill

[mikesal57]

So far ..things going good ...2 winners over 7/2

ex tri super in 5th

race 6 interesting...throwing out dominant early #2...so far hes 5-1
the 2's %E is 5pt rule but the other earlies have higher speed numbers

which wins out here?

[cdax]

Ted,

In Tam6 i would use the 2 @ 29% and meets POR. #3 and #9 are tie @ 18% and SR and may need tiebreaker rule, but I would use the 6 with the high sr.

Using Bris speed figs i end up on 2,3,1,8. Looking at your screenshot i end up with 2,6,7,1.

Tam7 and Tam9 both look good to me and come up the same with Bris srs.

Chris

[cdax]

Mike,

I usually box 4 horses in exacta which can include one low odds horse. If there are 2 horses at less then 7/2 i generally skip the exacta or key the to high odds over all 4 horses.

Tam6, my contenders are 2,3,1,8. If odds remain as they are now, I will bet $2 win on 2,3,8 and prob box the 4 horses hoping the 1 misses or only gets 2nd.

Chris

[Ted Craven]

Originally Posted by mikesal57

TED it would be nice if you can get the live tote in there with AI to make wagers

Live Tote will be everywhere - that's what I'm working on right now. The RDSS2 tote sucks at the moment (ask anyone). AI...

Ted

[cdax]

beaten by the chalk

[mikesal57]

TAMPA 7th...

This is what I dont believe in....

the 6 beats out the 9 because of the jockey %...but the 9 is 2 times better to get the lead over the 6 (30% vs 13%)..interesting again

[cdax]

FWIW,

I guess it depends on how you look at it (or interpret the rules), I may be bending them a little.

the 9 and 10 are virtually even to me in %. I imagining two speed horses battling for the lead. So between the 30% #9 and the 27% #10 I chose the 10. Now I should prob take the 9 over the 6 but with my srs the 6 is 5 points higher.

Still adapting to new pace.

Chris

[tfm]

I mean, isn't it obvious from the race sequence of the 10 that she was going to be able to control the race on the front end today? She routes on the front end, then she sprints (21.87 1st fraction). Only a rushed ride by the jock got her beat today.

[cdax]

I done for today. Quit while I'm behind.