Computer Program Best Of - Pace and Cap

shoeless · 12-17-2006, 10:37 AM

I wanted to find out if you had to pick one program that you feel best uses the match up which one would it be?

admin · 12-17-2006, 12:00 PM

Well Jeff for Me its Val2006 and someday soon
Ted Cravens RDSS

I quote Doc about 1 month ago

"Bill The Match up is built into all the advanced programs
Just follow what Jimmy says .." Then enter the proper pace lines
then just go to BL/BL"

The "Jimmy" that Doc is referring to of course is Mr. Bradshaw

Happy Holidays

Bill

noddub62 · 12-17-2006, 12:51 PM

Bill,

You said "Well Jeff for Me its Val2006 and someday soon
Ted Cravens RDSS" in a reply to Jeff. What are you refering to when you mention Val2006?

Thanks,
Bud

shoeless · 12-17-2006, 01:04 PM

I would think Bill meant Spec 160 but not too sure.

admin · 12-17-2006, 01:15 PM

Val 2006 was a test version of Validator that Ted Rich and I
worked with, That "fixed" the wild speed ratings that regular
Validator,and the other advanced Sartin programs were
generating after the Feb1 changes from Trackmaster.
I have a copy Ted sent Doc examples of races were the winner
paid over $9.00 that we worked. Doc gave the new version a nice OK
This sort of developed after I talked to Doc about the changes
Trackmaster made. Ted and Rich did a great job working with the test
I still use val 2006 because I personally just can't get used to Philly $5000
claimers running 100+ speed ratings after for 9 years seeing them run 70's But I'm sure that if I had stayed with the original Val 3
I would have adjusted

This might help explain http://bindfold.com/forums/showthrea...hlight=Val2006

HH
Bill

dugoutgold · 12-17-2006, 03:57 PM

all i can say is i wish i had a val2006 here Bill, I bought a house 8 years ago from winnings using val2 and went on to val3 thanks to late Elaine Best. Soon after that trackmaster did that change and I have never used it since I had the same dilema as you did. sighhhhhhh((

admin · 12-17-2006, 04:31 PM

Dougout,

Gee.... I hear you. I think I hold the record for most races happily done with Val 2/3 at Philly Park.and Richie P just about every were else It was such a nice fit. Such a user friendly comfortable program. After the Feb 1 change I tried Spec but I just can never get a feel for it. I tried Val 3 again after the TM change Doc
and I were talking about it and how I was struggling believing the new readouts Doc loved Validator he was very hurt when things went down with it. He mentioned that it was like a child of his. Ted did very good for Doc by making that test version So I'm sure RDSS will be a good replacement
If it were possible mass produce Val forever I would never be dedicated to it always. I realize that in a competitive market
well what ever

Happy Holidays
Bill

shoeless · 12-17-2006, 07:46 PM

Bill,Thanks for the response .Jeff

noddub62 · 12-17-2006, 10:28 PM

Bill,

Thanks for the info on the programs. Is it possible to get the new improved Val? I hace Val 3C & SPEC 160 but I also had better results w/ Val. I think that with Spec I have too much summary data to look at. With Val all I used was the Val printout and wagercapped. By the way how about a wagercap topic? Sure could use one.

Thanks again,
Bud

admin · 12-18-2006, 04:28 AM

Hi Bud
You will have to contact Ted Craven
ted@artofpace.com

Good Skill
and Happy Holidays
Bill

12-17-2006, 10:37 AM	#1
shoeless Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 4,151	Computer Program Best Of I wanted to find out if you had to pick one program that you feel best uses the match up which one would it be?

12-17-2006, 12:00 PM	#2
admin Administrator Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 2,643	for me Well Jeff for Me its Val2006 and someday soon Ted Cravens RDSS I quote Doc about 1 month ago "Bill The Match up is built into all the advanced programs Just follow what Jimmy says .." Then enter the proper pace lines then just go to BL/BL" The "Jimmy" that Doc is referring to of course is Mr. Bradshaw Happy Holidays Bill

12-17-2006, 01:15 PM	#5
admin Administrator Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 2,643	Val 2006 Val 2006 was a test version of Validator that Ted Rich and I worked with, That "fixed" the wild speed ratings that regular Validator,and the other advanced Sartin programs were generating after the Feb1 changes from Trackmaster. I have a copy Ted sent Doc examples of races were the winner paid over $9.00 that we worked. Doc gave the new version a nice OK This sort of developed after I talked to Doc about the changes Trackmaster made. Ted and Rich did a great job working with the test I still use val 2006 because I personally just can't get used to Philly $5000 claimers running 100+ speed ratings after for 9 years seeing them run 70's But I'm sure that if I had stayed with the original Val 3 I would have adjusted This might help explain http://bindfold.com/forums/showthrea...hlight=Val2006 HH Bill Last edited by admin; 12-17-2006 at 01:18 PM.

12-17-2006, 04:31 PM	#7
admin Administrator Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 2,643	Val 2 Dougout, Gee.... I hear you. I think I hold the record for most races happily done with Val 2/3 at Philly Park.and Richie P just about every were else It was such a nice fit. Such a user friendly comfortable program. After the Feb 1 change I tried Spec but I just can never get a feel for it. I tried Val 3 again after the TM change Doc and I were talking about it and how I was struggling believing the new readouts Doc loved Validator he was very hurt when things went down with it. He mentioned that it was like a child of his. Ted did very good for Doc by making that test version So I'm sure RDSS will be a good replacement If it were possible mass produce Val forever I would never be dedicated to it always. I realize that in a competitive market well what ever Happy Holidays Bill

12-18-2006, 04:28 AM	#10
admin Administrator Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 2,643	Val Hi Bud You will have to contact Ted Craven ted@artofpace.com Good Skill and Happy Holidays Bill

12-17-2006, 12:51 PM	#3
noddub62 Budman Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 797	Bill, You said "Well Jeff for Me its Val2006 and someday soon Ted Cravens RDSS" in a reply to Jeff. What are you refering to when you mention Val2006? Thanks, Bud

12-17-2006, 01:04 PM	#4
shoeless Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 4,151	I would think Bill meant Spec 160 but not too sure.

12-17-2006, 03:57 PM	#6
dugoutgold Grade 1 Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 206	all i can say is i wish i had a val2006 here Bill, I bought a house 8 years ago from winnings using val2 and went on to val3 thanks to late Elaine Best. Soon after that trackmaster did that change and I have never used it since I had the same dilema as you did. sighhhhhhh((

12-17-2006, 07:46 PM	#8
shoeless Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 4,151	Bill,Thanks for the response .Jeff

12-17-2006, 10:28 PM	#9
noddub62 Budman Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 797	Bill, Thanks for the info on the programs. Is it possible to get the new improved Val? I hace Val 3C & SPEC 160 but I also had better results w/ Val. I think that with Spec I have too much summary data to look at. With Val all I used was the Val printout and wagercapped. By the way how about a wagercap topic? Sure could use one. Thanks again, Bud

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Who Needs A Computer Program	shoeless	Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum	0	07-07-2006 03:28 PM
Selector Program	Houndog	Velocity Programs	11	06-13-2006 03:21 AM
Computer Generated ESP/ Early Shape/ Counter Energy Gift Exacta	RichieP	Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum	14	03-05-2006 03:54 PM