[Turbulator]

Originally Posted by Turbulator

Jim Bradshaw is part of the Methodology--A BIG PART--and he uses F1 as a stand alone factor.

Originally Posted by RichieP

Just for clarity Hat had no stand alone factor. Ok
Richie

Originally Posted by Tim Y

Nice to recognize someone who understands the truth when it is discovered.

What truth, Tim? Richie's statement about my quote is only about me. I misspoke. It has nothing to do with your original proclamation:

Originally Posted by Tim Y

2nd call is where to determine the front...

If that first call were real important, it would be a mainstay of the methodology and is isn't.

F1 certainly is a mainstay of the "Methodology" that I'm learning.

I made a mistake speaking for the Hat, but I think everyone here knows exactly what I meant. And what I meant is that the Hat considered the first call extremely important. More important, in fact, than just about anyone else did at the time using the "Methodology." Not that they all didn't use it to one degree or the other--they did.

That Hat might not have used it as a "stand alone" factor, but I don't think I would be out of line in saying that not only did he consider it essential, but also predictive. That's what I get from his teachings. In the "Minds Eye" articles that is the only fraction he is using to teach Richie. Now that might not be "stand alone," but it certainly is powerful.

I certainly do use F1 as a stand alone factor. It's a big part of the Hat's thinking, and an eye opening revelation if used properly. I have fully incorporated this "idea" into my handicapping.

I'll even go one step further. I believe I could do very well picking winners if the only fraction I could ever look at was the first fraction. Why? Because at this point in time F1 is the only fraction that I'm using! I believe the Hat, Richie and others could, and have, done so too; but that is only my opinion.

Now, if I misspoke again please correct me. This time I won't equivocate. I'll do a full mea culpa.