|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Google Site Search | Get RDSSGet RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
| General Discussion General Horse Racing Discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
turf historian
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,455
|
Help appreciated
Judging the Sovereign awards for year end and am using the following criteria,
1) What they did 2) Where they did it? (what was the competition like?) kudos to cross country abilities but top of the heap in a tough division works too. a remarkable horse in a small venue gets credit as well. 3) I think a very important aspect: How did the connections MANAGE the horse? Did they understand to place this horse where it could show it's potential, or were they blind to the horses real abilities? I would welcome any additional aspect YOU might consider if you were in my place. Thanks Last edited by Tim Y; 11-28-2008 at 06:18 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Under appreciated | Tim Y | General Discussion | 5 | 09-26-2008 03:45 PM |
| Engen | shoeless | Classic Sartin Programs - Support, Discussion | 6 | 07-30-2008 04:34 PM |
|