Boxing day - S.A. - Pace and Cap

RichieP · 12-25-2007, 10:25 AM

Here is race 4 on the sod.

I'll project off the #4 at 112.6

screenshots:
1) #4 pp's
2) Velocity
3) Energy
4) Tpr
5) Bl/Bl

RichieP · 12-25-2007, 10:37 AM

Race 5 at 6f on the rubber.

Projecting off the #1 at 44.6

screenshots
1) #1 pp's
2) velocity
3) energy
4) Tpr
5) Bl/Bl

RichieP · 12-25-2007, 11:09 AM

Race 6 at 6.5f on that crazy turf layout

Projecting off #10 at 43.9

screenshots
1) #10 pp's
2) Velocity
3) Energy
4) Tpr
5) Bl/bl

RichieP · 12-25-2007, 11:39 AM

The Grade 1 Malibu at 7f

projecting off the #5 at 44.6

screenshots
1) #5 pp's
2) Velocity
3) Energy
4) Tpr
5) Bl/bl

RichieP · 12-26-2007, 07:38 PM

How did software matching do??

3 of the 4 races won by the #1 total energy horse

$8.40
$7.60
$24.00 Malibu grade 1

Check it out

RichieP · 12-26-2007, 07:41 PM

Results of the 4 races

Dallas4lr · 12-27-2007, 06:16 AM

Rich,

RDSS is doing something strange in race 6 at SA at least on my computer. Either one of #10 (Bucks) last two pace lines should have him near the top in most of the analysis screens as in your post, But on my computer he was at the bottom, just doesnt make sense. Most of these horses have SA 6.5 T lines to chooe from so it cant be paceline selection the software is doing something screwy in this race.

Thanks
Carl

Dallas4lr · 12-27-2007, 06:29 AM

Ahhh,

Software is fine I went back in and reviewed the lines you choose and you made three paceline selections that seemed to totally change the readout. Three horses had last pacelines that were career best and you chose more realistic pacelines for them - #9, #11, #12. Once I change these lines I get basically the same readouts you did.

I'm still baffled how the #10 can go from bottom to top based on these pacelines changes, shouldnt he still be somewhere in the middle if you have the career best pacelines of the three horses selected.

But when you reduce the field down to 5 horses in the BL/BL screen the #10 falls from rank 1 to rank 3. Should I be reducing the field or leave all the PL selection in as you did???

This really highlights staying away from suspect career best as PL selections and possibly really looking at the BL/BL before you reduce the field down to 5 horses.

Thanks
Carl

RichieP · 12-27-2007, 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dallas4lr

Ahhh,

Software is fine I went back in and reviewed the lines you choose and you made three paceline selections that seemed to totally change the readout. Three horses had last pacelines that were career best and you chose more realistic pacelines for them - #9, #11, #12. Once I change these lines I get basically the same readouts you did.

I'm still baffled how the #10 can go from bottom to top based on these pacelines changes, shouldnt he still be somewhere in the middle if you have the career best pacelines of the three horses selected.

But when you reduce the field down to 5 horses in the BL/BL screen the #10 falls from rank 1 to rank 3. Should I be reducing the field or leave all the PL selection in as you did???

This really highlights staying away from suspect career best as PL selections and possibly really looking at the BL/BL before you reduce the field down to 5 horses.

Thanks
Carl

I don't really pay much attention to career best stuff Carl. Others do. I pick pace lines around a projected pace for an on the lead horse at both the 1st and 2nd calls. I pass all others and WAIT for races that are part of MY game plan.

If today calls for a 44 pace and a horse shows a super line against a 46 pace I am NOT using it. I don't care if the speed rating was 110 for the line. When I select lines around a proj pace MANY good things happen when one looks at a LOT of individual race readouts. I am going to stop here.

I am NOT hiding horses because I want to see the whole field including POSITIONAL running styles which will reveal todays matchup. Every race I work you will see I have marked my own running styles. I pay no attention to computer generated Esp.

Everyone does their own thing,it's all good. This is my way

Richie

Dallas4lr · 12-27-2007, 12:28 PM

Rich,

Thanks for going over all of this with me, I'm trying to learn all these aspects of RDSS since its new to me. I will really have to try a number of approaches and see what works best.

Information like this is very helpful for us newbes'.

Thanks
Carl

12-25-2007, 10:37 AM	#2
RichieP Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 7,019	Race 5 Race 5 at 6f on the rubber. Projecting off the #1 at 44.6 screenshots 1) #1 pp's 2) velocity 3) energy 4) Tpr 5) Bl/Bl Attached Images __________________ "Grampy I'm talking to you!"

12-25-2007, 11:09 AM	#3
RichieP Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 7,019	Race 6 Race 6 at 6.5f on that crazy turf layout Projecting off #10 at 43.9 screenshots 1) #10 pp's 2) Velocity 3) Energy 4) Tpr 5) Bl/bl Attached Images __________________ "Grampy I'm talking to you!"

12-26-2007, 07:41 PM	#6
RichieP Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 7,019	Results of the 4 races Attached Images __________________ "Grampy I'm talking to you!"

12-27-2007, 06:29 AM	#8
Dallas4lr Grade 1 Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Syracuse, NY Posts: 104	Ahhh, Software is fine I went back in and reviewed the lines you choose and you made three paceline selections that seemed to totally change the readout. Three horses had last pacelines that were career best and you chose more realistic pacelines for them - #9, #11, #12. Once I change these lines I get basically the same readouts you did. I'm still baffled how the #10 can go from bottom to top based on these pacelines changes, shouldnt he still be somewhere in the middle if you have the career best pacelines of the three horses selected. But when you reduce the field down to 5 horses in the BL/BL screen the #10 falls from rank 1 to rank 3. Should I be reducing the field or leave all the PL selection in as you did??? This really highlights staying away from suspect career best as PL selections and possibly really looking at the BL/BL before you reduce the field down to 5 horses. Thanks Carl Last edited by Dallas4lr; 12-27-2007 at 06:36 AM.

12-25-2007, 10:25 AM	#1
RichieP Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 7,019	Boxing day - S.A. Here is race 4 on the sod. I'll project off the #4 at 112.6 screenshots: 1) #4 pp's 2) Velocity 3) Energy 4) Tpr 5) Bl/Bl Attached Images __________________ "Grampy I'm talking to you!"

12-25-2007, 11:39 AM	#4
RichieP Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 7,019	Race 7 The Grade 1 Malibu at 7f projecting off the #5 at 44.6 screenshots 1) #5 pp's 2) Velocity 3) Energy 4) Tpr 5) Bl/bl Attached Images __________________ "Grampy I'm talking to you!"

12-26-2007, 07:38 PM	#5
RichieP Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 7,019	How did software matching do?? 3 of the 4 races won by the #1 total energy horse $8.40 $7.60 $24.00 Malibu grade 1 Check it out __________________ "Grampy I'm talking to you!"

12-27-2007, 06:16 AM	#7
Dallas4lr Grade 1 Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Syracuse, NY Posts: 104	Rich, RDSS is doing something strange in race 6 at SA at least on my computer. Either one of #10 (Bucks) last two pace lines should have him near the top in most of the analysis screens as in your post, But on my computer he was at the bottom, just doesnt make sense. Most of these horses have SA 6.5 T lines to chooe from so it cant be paceline selection the software is doing something screwy in this race. Thanks Carl

12-27-2007, 12:28 PM	#10
Dallas4lr Grade 1 Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Syracuse, NY Posts: 104	Rich, Thanks for going over all of this with me, I'm trying to learn all these aspects of RDSS since its new to me. I will really have to try a number of approaches and see what works best. Information like this is very helpful for us newbes'. Thanks Carl