Big 3rd fraction horses - Pace and Cap

shoeless · 04-13-2006, 10:44 PM

I was listening to an old sartin seminar tape and Doc,Brohammer and The Hat all agreed that putting in horses with big 3rd fraction numbers only will just screw up your readouts.Here is a horse from the 9th tomorrow at CT I would like to know if you would enter this horse or not from this paceline.

22.4 46.1 120.0 9[12 behind] 9[9behind] 6[9.5 behind 3[4.5 behind]

The behind is lengths

By me putting this horse in it's coming up big in all of the readouts.Jeff

Dap Daddi · 04-13-2006, 11:16 PM

What if the pact runs faster opening splits? The horse in my opinion based on the limited information you listed. Sound like he is a big closer!

Dap

shoeless · 04-14-2006, 06:28 AM

Dap,He is a big closer.I know I gave limited info but I wanted to see if people would put that paceline into the computer or not.The race was run at CT and the same distance as todays race 6.5 furlongs.Maybe Bill can put up the whole pp's of the horse it's called Atlas Peak running in the 9th at CT.Jeff

RichieP · 04-14-2006, 06:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shoeless

Dap,He is a big closer.I know I gave limited info but I wanted to see if people would put that paceline into the computer or not.The race was run at CT and the same distance as todays race 6.5 furlongs.Maybe Bill can put up the whole pp's of the horse it's called Atlas Peak running in the 9th at CT.Jeff

ok big bro go head now!

RichieP · 04-14-2006, 06:35 AM

same horse different look

partsnut · 04-14-2006, 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shoeless
Dap,He is a big closer.I know I gave limited info but I wanted to see if people would put that paceline into the computer or not.The race was run at CT and the same distance as todays race 6.5 furlongs.Maybe Bill can put up the whole pp's of the horse it's called Atlas Peak running in the 9th at CT.Jeff

Jeff, because we are good friends, I will offer my humble opinion of this race.
I believe the (8,1) might be the horses of choice here. whichever one gets the lead should keep it. The race sets up for an early or early presser type horse to win. I see the order of finish (first 4) being as follows:
8, 1, 5, 6.

There's a good possibility for a nice price.

04-13-2006, 10:44 PM	#1
shoeless Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 4,640	Big 3rd fraction horses I was listening to an old sartin seminar tape and Doc,Brohammer and The Hat all agreed that putting in horses with big 3rd fraction numbers only will just screw up your readouts.Here is a horse from the 9th tomorrow at CT I would like to know if you would enter this horse or not from this paceline. 22.4 46.1 120.0 9[12 behind] 9[9behind] 6[9.5 behind 3[4.5 behind] The behind is lengths By me putting this horse in it's coming up big in all of the readouts.Jeff

04-13-2006, 11:16 PM	#2
Dap Daddi Dap Daddi Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Minneapolis Posts: 138	Yes What if the pact runs faster opening splits? The horse in my opinion based on the limited information you listed. Sound like he is a big closer! Dap

04-14-2006, 06:35 AM	#5
RichieP Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 7,019	another look at same horse same horse different look Attached Images

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
PHA Jan 23 Race 9	cprescigno	Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum	13	01-26-2006 01:16 AM
Lone Speed Horses Exactas Sprints	shoeless	General Discussion	2	01-21-2006 08:43 AM

04-14-2006, 06:28 AM	#3
shoeless Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 4,640	Dap,He is a big closer.I know I gave limited info but I wanted to see if people would put that paceline into the computer or not.The race was run at CT and the same distance as todays race 6.5 furlongs.Maybe Bill can put up the whole pp's of the horse it's called Atlas Peak running in the 9th at CT.Jeff