Assinobia 8-11

[Hanger]

Did a quick card here for some practice and getting back to RDSS- mostly relying on Default PL with Best Perceptor- made selections without worrying about price, but did annotate for my own practice in my education here.

Obviously aiming to get high % winners from my top 3 selections.

R1- 4-2-3 4 may be too short to bet, but 2 will offer a decent price I think
R2- 7-4-6 chalky again but liking the 4 helps at that ML
R3- 2-4-3 ML on 2 is too short to play, may have a value bet on 3,4 perhaps
R4- 2-3-1 3 most likely but comes back to sprint, value on the 2 I think
R5- 8-1-4 doubt we see close to ML on the 8
R6- 5-8-1 5-1 ML seems much higher than I expect to get
R7- 5-4-8 both top 2 selections should be decent for a dutch

[ranchwest]

R6 ex

5,7 / 1,5,7

[ranchwest]

R7

6 / 2,5,8

[ranchwest]

Originally Posted by ranchwest

R7

6 / 2,5,8

6-7-3-1

i missed the bottom. Didn't see the 7 on the front end.

[Mitch44]

Best of luck Hanger on starting your journey toward success. Check your pace lines to see if you concur with them.

Mitch44

[Hanger]

Originally Posted by Mitch44

Best of luck Hanger on starting your journey toward success. Check your pace lines to see if you concur with them.

Mitch44

Thank you Mitch, I did end up changing a few that I thought were off because of distance or pace, but for the most part let the Perceptor do the work for PL's. Curious to see how it works at a track that have may "more class"

I have always enjoyed Assinobia Downs though, the track makes so much sense usually. Even for cheap horses.

[Hanger]

Originally Posted by Hanger

Did a quick card here for some practice and getting back to RDSS- mostly relying on Default PL with Best Perceptor- made selections without worrying about price, but did annotate for my own practice in my education here.

Obviously aiming to get high % winners from my top 3 selections.

R1- 4-2-3 4 may be too short to bet, but 2 will offer a decent price I think
R2- 7-4-6 chalky again but liking the 4 helps at that ML
R3- 2-4-3 ML on 2 is too short to play, may have a value bet on 3,4 perhaps
R4- 2-3-1 3 most likely but comes back to sprint, value on the 2 I think
R5- 8-1-4 doubt we see close to ML on the 8
R6- 5-8-1 5-1 ML seems much higher than I expect to get
R7- 5-4-8 both top 2 selections should be decent for a dutch

R1- WPS, EX, TRI ( Second Choice)
R2- WP, EX ( Third Choice)
R3- WPS, EX, TRI (Top Pick )
R4- WPS, EX, TRI- Had this COLD (Top Pick)
R5- WP, EX (Third Choice)
R6- MISS
R7- MISS

R1- 4.40 W $26.50 EX
R2- 12.5 W $37.70 EX
R3- 2.80 W $6.00 EX
R4- 11.30 W $44.40 EX
R5- 8.5 W $20.00 EX

$28 in Win Wagers on top 2 $18.5 Returned- A dutch of top would have returned better than the flat bet- but for sake of argument, just showing flat for this since I didn't select dutch amounts last night.

If I used odds as a rule- which I normally do, I dont have the winner in R1 or R3 but would have the winner in R2,R4,R5 which would have been $28 Wagered and $32.3 Returned - so with a proper dutch could have been a really good night.

$84 In Exacta Box $134.6 Returned


71% Winners from Top 3 Selections
42% Winners from Top 2


I am pretty happy for the first card I put out with RDSS- and not spending a lot of time with PL. No surprise I missed R6 and R7- admittedly spent the lowest amount of time on both of those due to time constraints.

[Mitch44]

71% top 3 is outstanding Hanger, congrats.

Mitch44

[Lt1]

Well done Hanger.
Tim