|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Google Site Search | Get RDSSGet RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
| Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum General Handicapping Discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bullhead City Az
Posts: 921
|
The hard way
Here's a race I won (the hard way).
Last edited by froggy; 06-02-2007 at 12:28 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bullhead City Az
Posts: 921
|
I went back for several days and got the %med of all the winners of tonights distances. Then I threw out the highest and the lowest and them averaged them out.
For 5.5f the magic number was 69.28 with 68.80 low and 69.53 high. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bullhead City Az
Posts: 921
|
Three horses came within the parameters.
My reason for doing it with this race was because only one horse measured 169.11 in tot energy and 4 others were within .67 of each other. Which one would be my second choice? Then when I started to review %med the high energy horse didn't fit, but three others did and with nice odds of 3/1, 9/2, and 18/1. So I dutched them for $2, $3, and $5. 6, 8, 10 I crossed my fingers and waited. None of the top 3 program horses came in The winner #8 paid $36.60 Froggy PS: I wonder where I learned how to do that. Last edited by froggy; 06-02-2007 at 12:59 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,643
|
reg no
Hi Froggy
Just to try something I entered your lines and wanted to see what BLBL/VDC came up with results =nothing Then I did the race myself with my lines and this is my BLBL/VDC The winner # 8 is not looking to well I don't think I would have won The APV and Class numbers for this race were pretty close so my win bets based on these readouts would have been after hiding the 8 , would have been 7 and 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bullhead City Az
Posts: 921
|
Bill,
You are right things were relatively close. And when things are close it seems ranking has little meaning.For me it seemed the only decider was the % med and of course it helped to cross my fingers. I thought either the 6 or the 10 would win, but then the 8 came on strong. As for using line 3 for the 1, I usually don't go back past about 3 months for a pace line for bottom level claimers unless they have some super works and line 1 was at this distance. On the 4, I never use an off track pace line unless it is the only one. In any event none of these lines put them in the % med ball park. I got 6 out of 10 last night and one of them in the top 2 in race #4 paid over $30. One could say it was a good night. If I had an easy way to make a track model using E/L I would do it. I'm open to suggestions. Froggy Last edited by froggy; 06-02-2007 at 09:06 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,643
|
Parameters
Doc asked me once to do something
He asked me to keep track of what the winners E/L readout was and to just add 1 thing what the horse paid I did this for about 60 races at philly I made seperate models for 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0 and the 8.0 8.3, all on the dirt I sent it to Doc he was very impressed and told me he would put it into the follow up but it never made it. Anyway what I saw was most winner were in a cluster of about 8-10 points the ones that were too early paid less or Very high The ones that were later than ave. paid better Thanks for the recap of your pace line selectoin It was very interesting . I just went best of the last 3 and against the projected pace Oh by the way We both were dead on on our projected pace estimates I checked the charts and I believe it was 22.3 and 46.4 Nice work Bill |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| hard to appreciate some things | TaWee | General Discussion | 8 | 07-27-2005 02:25 PM |
|