Woodbine 11-03-11 R(4) Using Synergism4

[partsnut]

Woodbine 11-03-11 R(4) Using Synergism4

This is a very tough race at 8.5 furlongs.
This race seems to fit a sustained horse and the pace projects (Fast)
The (2) should be the pacesetter and possibly go all the way if he can
hold and sustain the momentum he has built up in the early going.
I personally like the (2).
My projected order of finish would be:
(In this order)2-4-5-8

Here are my Synergism 4 read outs.
See if you agree.

[partsnut]

These 3 horses are within 5 points of the top TPR Horse.

The Pace of the race should be fast 4

[mikesal57]

Bill..

Is there a reason why you left the #1 out..Being an early horse too ..might turn things around??


mike

[partsnut]

Hi Mike,

I get my contenders from PaceAppraiser.
I'll add the file here.
Please see the attached file.

The (1) did not appeal to me because it
has been short on the speed number

[partsnut]

Partsnut:

My projected order of finish would be:
(In this order)2-4-5-8

The winner was in my top 2

[partsnut]

After the race was over I went into my Synergism 4 set-up file and changed the variant type to "DRF" from "PROJECTED"
Look what happened.

[mikesal57]

Originally Posted by partsnut

Hi Mike,

I get my contenders from PaceAppraiser.
I'll add the file here.
Please see the attached file.

The (1) did not appeal to me because it
has been short on the speed number

Bill....

if you see the charts, you would have seen the #1 getting out to the lead..
What did he do to the #2?...forced him to not get the lead.
This is why you ALWAYS leave the early horse(s) left in...he can change the out come of any race..
From what you shown..the 2 would have an easy lead..but he didnt !!
The 4 would have been a more certain choice for the win

mike

[alydar_ David]

Originally Posted by mikesal57

Bill....

if you see the charts, you would have seen the #1 getting out to the lead..
What did he do to the #2?...forced him to not get the lead.
This is why you ALWAYS leave the early horse(s) left in...he can change the out come of any race..
From what you shown..the 2 would have an easy lead..but he didnt !!
The 4 would have been a more certain choice for the win

mike

Good point, Mike.

[partsnut]

mikesal57:

Bill....
if you see the charts, you would have seen the #1 getting out to the lead..
What did he do to the #2?...forced him to not get the lead.
This is why you ALWAYS leave the early horse(s) left in...he can change the out come of any race..
From what you shown..the 2 would have an easy lead..but he didnt !!
The 4 would have been a more certain choice for the win

mike

Mike, what you say is very true but I felt the (2) would fade because he was not speed competitive.
After making a Variant adjustment, after the fact the (4) came up very strong. Even so, the (4) was in my top 2.

I am optomistically very hopeful that Ted is working on a feature that will allow RDSS to convert files to Syn2, Syn3, and Syn4.
When and if this transpires, RDSS will be unsurpassed and will be the best software out there.

[For The Lead]

Originally Posted by mikesal57

Bill....

if you see the charts, you would have seen the #1 getting out to the lead..
What did he do to the #2?...forced him to not get the lead.
This is why you ALWAYS leave the early horse(s) left in...he can change the out come of any race..
From what you shown..the 2 would have an easy lead..but he didnt !!
The 4 would have been a more certain choice for the win

mike

YOU ARE RIGHT!
Even in the “match up”, you start with which horse is going to make the lead at the first call…regardless of whether or not you think it will win. It is that horse’s pace that is the first piece of the POR from which other horses will be evaluated. Maybe that horse will get the lead on a softer pace because it isn't being pushed by another horse(s) today. That's the reason it should get evaluated. If you don’t evaluate the “early quitters” (), how do you know if they will quit...…OR NOT??

When the gates open one horse gets the lead. If no other horse passes it…it WINS!!