|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Google Site Search | Get RDSSGet RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read
| General Discussion General Horse Racing Discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,643
|
final
Here is the final BLBL
Basic wagercapping says throw out the low price favorite (THE 4 ) then bet the low odds horse that will pay over $7.00 that would be the 9 the second win bet would either be the 10 or now the 2 who went off at 15/1 after scratching the 4 it would move into the top 3 I bet the 9 and 10 the 9 won the 2 placed and the 10 showed |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,660
|
Bill,Doc said in his earlier stuff that wagercapping was not the way to go.If Im not mistaken he used to poke fun at Dick Mitchell for doing so.Jeff
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 467
|
Quote:
Between those two horses do you bet the one with the highest odds or the one with the highest rank (tier?)? Is it a judgment call? Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 467
|
Quote:
If anyone wants to go to the trouble of rereading Pace Makes the Race you'll be astounded (at least I was) at some of the prices those guys got on some very logical horses back then. If those same races were run today you wouldn't get anywhere near those same prices, which is probably the reason that somewhere along the way Doc changed his mind about wagercapping. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,660
|
There is really no way to assume that those prices would not have been the same.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,643
|
Jeff
Quote:
He was referring to people who said the 9 should pay $12.00 and that they would not bet it at $10.00 I hope to be able to talk to Doc in the next few days as a nice present to myself. I need to askl him some things I feel that this form of wagercapping =- hideing and betting the low and the high odds is the way to go I'm skimming around some follow ups I will have a better picture for you Wishing you the best Bill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,643
|
Quote:
The nine is the first bet I'm trying to see what the going off odds were for the ten were I know the 2 was about 15/1 yes the 2 horse should be bet if you hide the 4 1 more thing is the field size. I now its in the follow ups but in a short field if you throw out the favorite a longer price horse has to have some vital readout support This needs to be adressed as I feel it is now and will be a very solid tool its not the METHODOLGY its a tool for some of us and I hope people will consider it |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 467
|
Doc himself would disagree with you. Perhaps someone can post a quote from one of the followups where he said as much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,660
|
It doesnt matter who agrees or not there is no way to tell.A Rod hit 54 homers this year would he have done the same thing in the 1930's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 467
|
Quote:
...My last post on the subject... |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Kee 10-15-06 Race - 1 (Nice Ticket) | partsnut | Selections | 1 | 10-15-2006 11:24 PM |
| HOU 03-18-06 (Small Investment - Nice Hit) | partsnut | Selections | 2 | 03-19-2006 09:40 AM |
| Nice comments | Binder | General Discussion | 0 | 10-26-2005 12:12 AM |
| nice day at Monmouth | nomorebocci | General Discussion | 2 | 10-24-2005 04:41 PM |
|