|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Google Site Search | Get RDSSGet RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
| General Discussion General Horse Racing Discussion |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,654
|
You're not as smart as you think you are...
...or, at least I'm not.
It's interesting (and should be helpful) to note motifs in one's betting. For example, I always tend to outsmart myself. Here are my personal results for prime plays on dirt races for non-maidens this year; these are single win bets on "can't lose" horses going off at 4-1 or more. Obviously, these bets don't come up every day. I won 21% of my win bets. Note, if I'd made a flat bet on each on them I'd have gotten back $1.55 for every dollar I invested. So, what really happened? By varying my bet size I got back $1.33 for every $1.00 invested. My duh. The thing is...this happens every year. I keep records. I know. So, why do I persist in outsmarting myself? Good question. |
|
|
|
|
|
|