|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Google Site Search | Get RDSSGet RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
| General Discussion General Horse Racing Discussion |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#10 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,676
|
Ted, I ranked the 2 and 6 as equals because the 6 only had a 3 in the 4 numbers and the 2 while only having 3 numbers one was a two.
My order was 1,4-5-2,6 making the 2 & 6 tied for 3rd. In reality you are right in your rankings ( by the numbers) I allow a little room for judgement when it comes to separating my 3rd 4th and 5th ranked horses. Just remember that any horse with 3 or 4 ratings will win 80- to 85% of the races. Richard |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Rmath's contender elimination using CSR rankings | lone speed | RDSS2 / FAQ's | 7 | 08-28-2022 04:00 AM |
| Race using Rmath's method | shoeless | Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum | 23 | 12-31-2012 05:30 PM |
|