Past Performance Mis-information between Spec160 vs. RDSS - Pace and Cap

mufasa · 07-14-2007, 09:10 AM

Ted:

I have noticed the following on two races in Belmont’s card for today 7/14/07:

1. In race # 1, horse #3 Heaven’s Flame: Spec 160 has pace line #6 as the #1 ranked Perceptor line and RDSS for the same horse has line #3 as the #1 ranked Primary. If you look closely the race dates and conditions do not match? I use Brisnet as my past performance printing source and the races match up as to Spec 160 but not RDSS (Trackmaster).
2. In race #8, horse #9 Carnera (same thing again as above): Spec 160 has pace line #7 as the #1 ranked Perceptor line and the RDSS for the same horse has line #9 as the #1 ranked Primary. Again the race dates and conditions do not match up.

Thanks,

Robert

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
LONE STAR 7th AND SPEC160	stormbringer	Speculator	10	04-20-2007 04:23 PM
Spec160 does it again	froggy	Speculator	0	03-26-2007 09:14 PM
Newbie & Spec160 @ MNR	Ted Craven	Speculator	1	01-30-2007 09:55 AM
Past Performance Generator	Fast4522	General Discussion	9	11-18-2005 06:14 PM

07-14-2007, 09:10 AM	#1
mufasa Grade 1 Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 310	Past Performance Mis-information between Spec160 vs. RDSS Ted: I have noticed the following on two races in Belmont’s card for today 7/14/07: 1. In race # 1, horse #3 Heaven’s Flame: Spec 160 has pace line #6 as the #1 ranked Perceptor line and RDSS for the same horse has line #3 as the #1 ranked Primary. If you look closely the race dates and conditions do not match? I use Brisnet as my past performance printing source and the races match up as to Spec 160 but not RDSS (Trackmaster). 2. In race #8, horse #9 Carnera (same thing again as above): Spec 160 has pace line #7 as the #1 ranked Perceptor line and the RDSS for the same horse has line #9 as the #1 ranked Primary. Again the race dates and conditions do not match up. Thanks, Robert