|
Sartin Methodology
Ok,
My viewpoint is not shared by the methodology in general. I think Sartin Methodology today is only a name given to something that has morphed into many programs and not just the old ones which I still use. Sure folks want to keep the old ways alive and I also understand that, but read the start of the thread and pehaps notice sometime down the road in the post parade if a starter is doing what I mentioned in the post, notice it a few times and keep score of it and you will in fact find these things to be true. I did not learn them from the methodology but did share them in a what I though was a superb post. I am not saying old things do not work in sartin when in fact just about anything that was written 20 years ago in sartin still works. The things I mentioned in this post are olso old, maybe as much as the oldest racetracks are (where I picked them up), and also still work. Is the Sartin methodology only about what doc has put out? The answer is yes 20 years ago, but today I doubt it unless your total retro. I would suggest if you have a open mind, that you may do well with Val3 for many years from now as well. The program still works beautifully if you can figure out what the connections are doing in the race, not everyone is running to win. Racing Secretaries fill races with starters that are not well ment every day at every racetrack, which is what the post was inspired and the fact that I myself am not a wager capping fan. I have always thought and still do think the best horse in the race will run its best no matter what its odds are.
Last edited by Fast4522; 02-21-2006 at 07:51 PM.
|