Go Back   Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up > Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...) > Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum
Get RDSS
Google Site Search Get RDSS Sartin Library RDSS FAQs Conduct Register Site FAQ Members List Today's Posts

Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum General Handicapping Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-27-2012, 09:57 AM   #1
For The Lead
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,292
MODELING - Does it matter?

Here is a handicapping statistic I keep and the results of that statistic for the current month of January.
It has a dollar net of $1.85 based on a single horse bet. Not too impressive, is it?
At this point the only surface that is not included is turf.

It seems many people (not all) only model on the basis of ‘distance and surface’. Well, as you can see the $1.85 dollar net is all inclusive except for turf, so let’s take a deeper look at this. I’ll break these races down by race type.

ST (stake races).................= $1.50 dollar net
AL(allowance race).............= $0.58 dollar net
SA (starter hcp races).........= $1.27 dollar net
MS (maiden special weight)..=$0.48 dollar net
MC (maiden claiming)..........= $1.13 dollar net
OC (optional claiming).........= $1.94 dollar net

We started with a dollar net of $1.85 and except for the 'OC' which is $1.94 (just .09 higher) these are terrible, but if they are terrible then something had to be good. It was.

CL (claiming races)...= $2.46 dollar net
I have taken a dollar net that is much better than average and yet still a loser at $1.85 and found something that has a dollar net of $2.46 or an ROI of +23%, just by breaking down the races by race type.

But let’s take an even closer look. What happens if we break this down by sex?
CL/males.....= $2.18
CL/females..= $2.83

Both are winners, but I like $2.83 a lot better than $2.18.

Like I said at the start, I only excluded turf, so let’s see how this does on dirt and artificial surfaces.
Dirt........= $2.43
Artificial..= $2.51

Not much difference there

Let’s take a look at some extremes with different tracks.
Track A...= $1.41(lowest)
Track B...= $3.39(highest)

Enough said there.

How about distances?
Sprints...= $2.00
Routes...= $3.22

Enough said there as well.

Oh, remember that 'OC' with a $1.94 dollar net? Let's take another look at that. I'll break it down by sex.

OC/males......=$2.39
OC/females...=$1.23

You just never know if you don't look.

So you see what you can do with something that initially appears to be a loser when you break races down into various categories.

If you aren’t modeling, maybe you should be.
If you are only modeling distance and surface, maybe you should reconsider you approach to modeling.

Just some food for thought.
__________________
"It's suppose to be hard. If it was easy, everybody would do it." Jimmy Dugan, A League of Their Own
For The Lead is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why Calif. will get away with this crime Charlie D General Discussion 22 09-20-2010 12:45 PM
Sometimes its there - no matter what & you just have to believe it! Bill Lyster Races of Interest 10 04-19-2010 10:04 AM
Modeling Sheets problem dogkatcher RDSS 6 08-06-2009 09:07 AM
Value of Modeling For The Lead RDSS 15 07-28-2009 04:19 PM
Modeling Keenland partsnut Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum 4 04-19-2009 02:29 PM


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:39 AM.