|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Google Site Search | Get RDSSGet RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read
| Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...) Interactive Teaching & Learning - Race Conditions, Contenders, Pacelines, Advanced Concepts, Betting ... |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#8 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Valley Stream NY
Posts: 11,522
|
Bill I'm aware of the stats which generally make these types of horses poor win bets, however,
I take each race as it comes. I don't automatically toss a horse. I have my contender selection process and if 1 of these types survives the initial round it stays until I toss it for other handicapping reasons. This doesn't mean the horse will be a win bet but it could fill the underneath positions. I'm also aware of other approaches used by members but I prefer mine which have served me well over the years. Tim
__________________
Trust but verify Last edited by Lt1; 06-19-2018 at 07:43 PM. |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Handicapping Blind - Using Velocity PoH/TPR/Primary screens | Jeebs | Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...) | 24 | 05-31-2017 10:56 AM |
| Question on Paceline Selection - DMR0828 R2 | kpmats10 | Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...) | 5 | 09-09-2016 09:29 AM |
| Posting Races | Bill V. | August Contest | 0 | 08-07-2012 08:11 AM |
| MatchUP intuition is "Primary", MatchUP mathematics is "Corollary"/Secondary | VoodooFan | Matchup Discussion | 41 | 02-27-2011 04:05 PM |
| Paceline Selection | Ted Craven | RDSS | 4 | 01-27-2011 02:41 PM |
|