|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Google Site Search | Get RDSSGet RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read
| RDSS - Leverage/Pace Discussion about a NEW RDSS approach to identifying Key Contenders, the Pace Bias and a structured betting approach |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
02-26-2026, 01:44 PM
|
#1 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 330
|
Thanks, Guys.
I realized after I posted that I did not make clear that to qualify as a LS the horse must be a non-contender by whatever method you use to identify your contenders. In fact, the reason I chose this race was because the winner was a non-contender by either the 4-Score or the Leverage Pace approach and was easy to read as a Longshot play with supporting evidence. So, thanks for clarifying that Tim. Dick
__________________
Haakon 47 'Something magical happens when you bring together a group of people from different disciplines with a common purpose.' Mark Stefik Palo Alto Research Centre Fellow Last edited by kahunab; 02-26-2026 at 01:53 PM. Reason: Text got scrambled. |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Saratoga 2010 - Workbook for the Seminar | Ted Craven | 2010 | 9 | 08-28-2010 05:13 PM |
| The Mind for Consistent Results - Psychology of Trading & Wagering | RichieP | General Discussion | 5 | 04-01-2009 01:01 PM |
|
Hybrid Mode
