Pizzola's window

[admin]

Originally Posted by Speculator

Thank you for sharing this unique look at the grass.

For today at Gulfstream in Race 6 I see 2-7-4 in that order on 3 screen using your outline so 2 and 7 would be the top 2.

Gulfstream Race 8 I see 6-3-4 in that order so 6 and 3 would be the top 2.

These races are after scratches.

Can you check your reads and confirm/deny/enlighten ??

Thank you
The Speculator

Hello Mr Speculator
Welcome to our group. Nothing major here but the name Speculator
here on Pace and Cap is kind of a brand name.
Ted Craven pays for advertising space on this board so I would rather you not use that brand name. Your opinions are yours and It might not be fair
to Ted
I also see a new member RDSS and Validator I will ask them to not to
use these names. RDSS for obvious reasons and Validator is Doc's
program

Originally Posted by tompkins

Since they changed the track configuration, I don't play Gulfstream....especially when Tampa offers such juicy cards and good prices down the road.

ok appreciate the feedback. Fwiw I worked the 2 races mentioned at Gp with nothing happening. Then I also did the 9th from Fg and the $5.20 winner was ranked 1st on 3 screen. Interesting stuff when other things are looked at as possible secondary corrolaries.

BTW I have been asked by the moderator to change my handle as there is some sort of conflict. Maybe I will reincarnate as "Turf Speculator"

Thank you again for sharing your idea

Moderator can you please remove my "name" from the member's roles.
Thank you

[admin]

[quote=

BTW I have been asked by the moderator to change my handle as there is some sort of conflict. Maybe I will reincarnate as "Turf Speculator"

Thank you again for sharing your idea

Moderator can you please remove my "name" from the member's roles.
Thank you[/quote]


Thank you Mr T.S.
Your good to go. Welcome to Pace and Cap'

[tompkins]

Turf Speculator, when I am seriously wagering on a blade runner (turf horse) I always try to find a second line that substantiates the first one I discover. Cuts down on sample error.

Remember we are looking for the performer, NOT just the performance. If the horse is that good, irelative to this field, it should give you indications that it had performed at that level in the past.

Exception of course is a developling young horse who has only recently started on the green.