Go Back   Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up > Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...) > Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum
Get RDSS
Google Site Search Get RDSS Sartin Library RDSS FAQs Conduct Register Site FAQ Members List Today's Posts

Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum General Handicapping Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-07-2008, 01:51 PM   #21
Tim Y
turf historian
 
Tim Y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,455
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlie D View Post
Tim behave yourself, there is more than one path to the pot of gold
of course there is.......But there are just some ridiculous "left overs" from Jcapper and the musings regarding that program...There was the contention that NATIONAL ODDS were dropping since the inception of that program......Delusions of grandeur. NO SINGLE HANDICAPPING method has that effect, not us, not Thorograph, the Sheets..nothing...

I just got, and continue to, get a hoot out of that contention.
Tim Y is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2008, 01:55 PM   #22
Charlie D
Match Up Apprentice
 
Charlie D's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,105
Fair enough Tim, but better to anaylse the data and put forward a reasonable opinion, for or against

Last edited by Charlie D; 11-07-2008 at 01:58 PM.
Charlie D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2008, 02:09 PM   #23
Tim Y
turf historian
 
Tim Y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,455
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlie D View Post
Fair enough Tim, but better to anaylse the data and put forward a reasonable opinion, for or against
I have seen dozens of Jcapper predictions and they weren't knocking down the walls........
Tim Y is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2008, 02:19 PM   #24
Charlie D
Match Up Apprentice
 
Charlie D's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,105
Fair enough Tim, but have you an opinion regarding this particular JCapper research???
Charlie D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2008, 02:26 PM   #25
Tim Y
turf historian
 
Tim Y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,455
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlie D View Post
Fair enough Tim, but have you an opinion regarding this particular JCapper research???
Surface yes......especially back east
Tim Y is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2008, 02:34 PM   #26
Charlie D
Match Up Apprentice
 
Charlie D's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Y View Post
Surface yes......especially back east

Right, do i need to go get a passport, jump on a plane, find you, kidnap you and torture you to get this opinion or can you save me this hassle by posting it on here

Last edited by Charlie D; 11-07-2008 at 02:36 PM.
Charlie D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2008, 02:40 PM   #27
Tim Y
turf historian
 
Tim Y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,455
No simply asking will do. I am ready to come back to your country at first asking as I really enjoyed hanging out at Ladbroke's and watched the Grand National there as my choice ran 4th....fairly good in a field of that size and danger.


Compounding NATIONAL data like Jcaper does, makes the specifics of a distance and course like Woodbine's 7 furlong unique energy distribution, DILUTED in the evaluation. There is enough specificity at differing race tracks DAY IN AND DAY OUT to trump the averaged out malarkey of database analysis. Following the daily trends in e/l numbers taught me that a long time ago.

It is backing CHANGE, not sameness, that wins the money

Last edited by Tim Y; 11-07-2008 at 02:46 PM.
Tim Y is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2008, 02:47 PM   #28
Tim Y
turf historian
 
Tim Y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,455
1,2 6 in this 6th,,,the e/l should be dominant at this course Two IS IMPROVING so that might be the wager
Tim Y is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2008, 02:52 PM   #29
Houndog
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,258
Woodbine 7 furlongs

What may I ask makes 7 furlong races unique at Woodbine? Since you are very familiar with this track I am hoping you can expound on your post. Tim you may disagree with Jeff Platt but he is trying to answer a question that was posted originally by Turbulator.

Calling a person a reductionist doesn't make it for me.
Houndog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2008, 02:56 PM   #30
Tim Y
turf historian
 
Tim Y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,455
outsmart oneself in calling th E/L the dominant factor and then overlooking it here.....LEARN TO REVIEW!
Attached Images
 
Tim Y is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MatchUP Observation Turbulator Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum 17 08-21-2008 07:55 PM
Matchup Webinar - Saturday October 18th 2008 RichieP Matchup Discussion 31 08-08-2008 07:56 AM


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:42 AM.