|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Google Site Search | Get RDSSGet RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
| Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum General Handicapping Discussion |
| View Poll Results: What is your opinion of E/L Relativity ? | |||
| It is a good tool -Something I will include in my decision making procedure |
|
10 | 52.63% |
| Its not presented properly I don't see what is being descriped |
|
3 | 15.79% |
| The creator is trying to help the group |
|
1 | 5.26% |
| The creator is full of it |
|
5 | 26.32% |
| Its interesting But I am realy just reading to see the creator dodge and tap dance around questions |
|
1 | 5.26% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 708
|
clarification
I never use the bottom line readouts. Same info is redundent on other screens
__________________
velocititian |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 798
|
Your early late theory certainly has merit for sprints but I think your are off base in promoting it as the soemething that works as a high probability for routes.. Take a single track and model it for Routes by distance (1 mi, 1'16 1'8) over 20 races and I don't think you will see it as a big factor... As a matter of fact I don't see you turning a flat profit choosing the top 2 E/L in routes over a 20 race period.. When we don't model we tend to just remember the successes. You provided 2 examples but 1 was a sprint (7fr) and the other a route so it really isn't even 2 examples of it working on the same track same day for routes... I'm more of an EPR/TS guy for sprints and LPR/TS guy for routes... Rank both for your contenders and average them and rank the average..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 708
|
Quote:
__________________
velocititian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 708
|
just keeps repeating
Aqueduct's third top two e/l's are first and third. This time the winner 2 was 6/1
__________________
velocititian |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 708
|
Quote:
__________________
velocititian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 708
|
another one
Tampa's 5th A ROUTE e/l relativity again
that is a bad image...I will do it again
__________________
velocititian Last edited by tompkins; 03-10-2006 at 02:29 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 798
|
Show me 20 races over a weeks time where it works in routes and I'll buy it.. Otherwise you are just showing us successes without any acknowledgement of when it doesn't work... Presenting the exception as the rule.. Thats how Amway recruits... Hit the 3rd at AQU but wasn't so fortunate on the early horses in the 5th and 7th.. Got the 2 and 7 in the 8th. Top 2 EPR/TS
Update 7 beaten late... 3 Consecutive races where late gets up Last edited by jms62; 03-10-2006 at 04:26 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 708
|
never took geometry?
Ideas are presented. Folks try them at the venues they follow. If they work okay, and if they don't okay. I don't have to the time to drag all those screens up for you. Do it yourself...remember all those times the teacher told the class "The proof is left to the student?" Same here
__________________
velocititian |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 708
|
Quote:
You are assuming we are looking at the same pace lines and I doubt that seriously as I use an idea called an "early filter" even after several lines are chosen
__________________
velocititian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 708
|
Quote:
You, and most others are missing the essence of this angle so I will leave it at that.
__________________
velocititian |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|