Blanket statements are dumb

[For The Lead]

Originally Posted by Charlie D

I'm refering to the statement as it was presented by Tim so why should i see what you have added? to suit yourself.

I don't have an agenda. I was just offering an explanation. You either understand or you don't, it doesn't matter to me one way or the other.

Good night and good luck.

[Charlie D]

You may not have an agenda, but you have added your own thoughts to what was stated in OP.

Do you really think because of that i'm now going to say something like " OK, i agree your correct " if so, i'd think again

[clore1030]

Originally Posted by Charlie D

Just like Tims 1:3 ratio opinion does not deserve to be called dumb though some may state so.

Well, if someone does refer to it as dumb, we can just refer them to page "L" of the yellow manual (page 12 as per the Adobe Acrobat counter) in the Club Pace and Cap forum.

On that page, tracks are defined as 1:3 being an "early pace" track, 1:2 being "average" and 1:1 being a "sustained" track.

That doesn't mean that it can't still be called dumb, it just means that it's not Tim's opinion.

[tom]

As I study the match up in the Hat thread here, one of the keys when you have multiple earlies is to decide if one is superior or if an OTE will win the race.