|
Google Site Search | Get RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
RDSS2 / FAQ's Information, discussion, screenshots, videos about the upcoming version, FAQ's |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-21-2012, 10:28 PM | #1 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,676
|
Statistics
Some food for thought.
Stats for AQU. 1.) I used all horses entered in these races. Absolutely no filters. 2.) Used best of last 3 at a comparable distance when possible. 3.) Sorted contenders down to final 5 using Primary Line Scores. 4.) Marked all New Pace horses. 5.) I marked the top 4 ranked horses from the Gap Fire ratings. Eliminations: All horses not ranked in top 4 VDC, Gap fire or NP. 7 wins in 300 eliminated .02 with no rating at all. Next I eliminated any horses with only one rating. 18 more eliminated 6%. This left me with 275/300 wins in my final contenders 92%of all wins. From these final horses I ranked them according to their ranks a#1 rating won 145 a#2 rating won 73 a#3 rating won 32 a#4 rating won 25 |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
when baloney gains credibility | Tim Y | Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum | 15 | 03-21-2009 08:14 AM |