The Dynamics of Incremental Exertion

[Bill V.]

F1 + F2 + F3

[Charlie D]

A good diagram Bill imo

It shows clearly what effect Fr1 has on Fr2 and Fr3


anyone choosing to ignore Fr1 would be missing large part of the puzzle wouldn't they?

[Bill V.]

Yes Charlie

Its all in the follow ups and manuals

Really got upset by the post you and I both saw
Gee... How much of the race is over by the time they hit the pole after
the second fraction?



GS
Bill

[Charlie D]

Try not to be upset Bill


I'm sure Doc came across loads of people that misinterpreted the Science

[shoeless]

Bill,Where did that come from?Jeff

[Bill V.]

Originally Posted by shoeless

Bill,Where did that come from?Jeff

Hello Jeff

The diagram is from Follow Up 15 I highlighted the red box area

I didn't want to muck up your post were you asked about
two horses I believe it was horses 5 and 6 position ect'

I did not agree with what was posted ....

......., and the ENTIRE methodology is dependent upon TWO major factors: the 2nd call and the final fraction. THAT'S it!

I try to understand everyones opinion But I disagree with what Tim wrote

Charlie and I seem to feel that the first fraction is very important
and a vital calculation to many of the readouts in the methodology and vital to working the match up

Thanks for your interest

Bill

[Charlie D]

As the diagram shows The Match Up is F1 + Fr2 + Fr3, the essence of the Methodology is the Match Up

If someone chooses to ignore Fr1 or Fr2 or Fr3 they are NOT using the Methodology imo

[shoeless]

There are NO RULES to the Methodology" - Jim "The Hat" Bradshaw


If this is the case then why do you believe Tim is not using the Methodology




Where does turn time start and end?

[Charlie D]

Re-read post 03.44, in particular


The ESSENCE of the Methodology IS the Match Up

Edited to add

I didn't mention any names, i stated someone ignoring Fr1 or Fr2 or Fr3

[Charlie D]

From The Match Up Manual