Review MNR race 6 12/18

[Bill V.]

Jim G bet and won this race in the RDSS contest

Here is my review
A consistant use of the Sartin Methodology leads to this
double digit winner.

Here are my notes




CL5000N2-6M

3+ non winner 2 race in 6 months

Life time and 2012 records Who has won in 2012 ?

H1 16-60 3-16

H2 9-63 20Places 4-17

H3 7-31 3-14

H4 9-42 3-16

H5 4-45 1-20

H6 7-47 3-20

H7 4-25 1-11

H8 3-43 1-10

Running Styles

H1 Press 3 line 3

H2 Sus 1 Line 1 is dull 3 strait places at open5000cl ?

H3 SP 2 Line 3 line 1-2 non comparable CT

H4 Early 6 Line 1 will be a pace factor

H5 Early 5 Lin1 is a dull effort again Non winner 1 in year excuse?

H6 Sus 3 No Route form will be a factor early

H7 Press 1 comes right back off the 7500 show finish Line 1

H8 Ugly 30/1

1 3 4 7

The 4 is out being early and not able to get the lead on the

The sprinters will kill the 4. I think the 3 is a lock being the 0.0

horse in 1st and 2nd segments

The 1 and 3 and 7 are tops on BLBL
For thoromation users the 1 and 3 win


Win bets 1 -3

Screens








Entries

[Bill V.]

4 5 6

[Bill V.]

6 7 8

[Bill V.]

BLBL thoromation and result chart

[For The Lead]

Bill,

Your choice of line 3 for the eventual winner is right on the money.

When looking at the horse's PP's it might be easy to say that after a long string of decent races, maybe the horse finally went out of form in its' last two races. That is...until you take a look at the track where the horse ran those last two races, CT.

CT is a "bullring" track, with sharper turns and shorter straights and many horses just don't negotiate those tracks very well. Obviously, the #3 horse is one of those horses.

The line 3 back is from just 58 days ago, so there is no concern that that line is old and stale.

Good job.