|
Google Site Search | Get RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
Pace Makes the Race / TPR Discussion, Examples, Lessons from Total Pace Ratings (TPR) aka 'Phase I' from the book 'Pace Makes the Race' |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-29-2005, 09:51 PM | #1 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,152
|
tpr ratings analysis
How would you apply these TPR to this 7 fur race at Charles Town?Will the race setup early or late?Who would you bet to win?Who would you play in exacta's?Sorry it came out crooked my computer skills suck.Shoeless
HORSE EPR FFR TPR DIFF FLY 76 81 157 5 INTUIT 76 80 156 4 MAN 81 72 153 -9 CITY 80 73 153 -7 MAG 74 79 153 5 UNISON 78 75 153 -3 |
12-30-2005, 10:13 AM | #2 | |
Grade 1
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 108
|
Quote:
opposite profile favoring late balance( 76/81, 76/80) would land u on "fly" and "intuit" that is the most profitable way to use tpr numbers Shoeless . Dick Schmidt will tell you most people will not do the work necessary to make these simple yet effective numbers "talk to you". very effective and simple at the same time CN |
|
12-30-2005, 11:06 AM | #3 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,152
|
CHIP,But what if you model shows the track to be running even then how would you interperate the race then.Man and City burn each other out or not.Or maybe you shouldnt use the TPR numbers that way.Jeff
|
12-30-2005, 11:12 AM | #4 | |
Grade 1
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 108
|
Quote:
PASS There will be another race in 20 minutes CN |
|
12-09-2015, 03:42 PM | #5 |
The egg man
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 10,005
|
model
Jeff, ln your race example.
If your model says the track/distance says EVEN I would bet my top 2 TPR. Fly and Tuit They have a 2 point advantage , they have FFR's near 80, the two top Epr horses are close but they have weak ( low 70's ) FFR ratings Last edited by Bill V.; 12-09-2015 at 03:44 PM. |
12-09-2015, 04:34 PM | #6 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 8,859
|
Bill, if you had waited another 3 weeks, it would have been an even 10 years since the previous post
Where does the time go ... (None the less, a good take on reading the TPR numbers based on a track/distance model). Ted
__________________
RDSS - Racing Decision Support System™ |
12-09-2015, 05:59 PM | #7 |
The egg man
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 10,005
|
pmtr
Thanks Ted
Shoeless and I have been discussing TPR ratings in RDSS lately He has come a long way in 10 years Bill |
12-09-2015, 07:50 PM | #8 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,152
|
Hi Bill,
Thanks for the input I have come a long way in those 10 years but not sure how good it has been, made a lot of mistakes that I regret. Jeff |
12-27-2015, 11:59 AM | #9 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Flint Hills in Kansas, formerly from Montana
Posts: 334
|
A computer meltdown caused me to lose login creds (as well as tons of other essential data) and it wasn't until this morning I recovered them. Back in biz now though.
"I have come a long way in X years..." Hasn't been nearly 10 years, but certainly a lot of water under the bridge. TPR concept is one of the most consistently strong factors I adopted from using RDSS. It has become a mainstay on the list of factors I consult for every race I handicap. In fact I use it as a database filter to detect bias and find it to be distinctly effective as a predictive tool. Hope everyone is happy, healthy, and ready for another successful year of handicapping. Best wishes to all.
__________________
Serious fun. www.cappersoverlay.com |
|
|