Go Back   Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up > General Discussion
Google Site Search Get RDSS Sartin Library RDSS FAQs Conduct Register Site FAQ Members List Today's Posts

General Discussion General Horse Racing Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-16-2019, 12:47 PM   #1
rdiam
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 606
Do You Have A +EV Methodology?

Reading some of the recent posts on this board, there seems to be some confusion between picking winners and winning $ (+EV). If you want to pick winners, just bet the favorite every race: these days, especially at tracks with small fields, you will average close to 40% winners. Bet horses going off 7/5 or lower, and you will average better than 40% winners. Bet horses going off less than 1:1 (even money) and you will average better than 50% winners! No handicapping needed, just watch the tote...


Unfortunately, picking these high probable winners won't actually increase your bottom line, although you will lose at something less than the roughly 20% takeout.


Of course, no one is actually advocating betting on chalk these days, but what if your methodology seems to pick mostly horses that pay less than $10? I would propose that you need to revise your methodology, since playing horses going off less than 4-1 puts you in direct competition with the large rebate players who will pound these horses in the pari-mutuel pool. Unless you are getting rebates of 8% or higher, it will be rare that any of these win bets offer +EV. The focus in these races will have to be to avoid the win pool, and focus on horizonal and/or vertical bets that combine these chalky horses with non-chalk. Of course, this requires other (and possibly new) handicapping skills such as finding the place horse, or classifying a race favorite as legit or vulnerable.


What about win bets? I propose that you test your methodology by a sample that contains only horses that pay $10 or more in races that you bet on. If, in this sample (30 races or more), you find you have a +EV, then you can conclude you have a winning methodology for betting in the win hole. If you are not making $ betting these races, you either need to adjust your methodology or pass on making win bets. Remember, when a horse pays $10 or more to win, you are unlikely to be sharing the win pool with the large rebate syndicates, and likely have +EV.


Bottom line, earning +EV from betting horses involves both the win percentage and the mutual payoff. Just be aware that they are negatively correlated, which can affect one's psyche when playing this game. In addition, your variance will be higher when avoiding favorites in the win hole. So why torture yourself win betting horses going off 4-1 or higher? Because, as the bank robber Willie Sutton once said when asked why he robbed banks, "That's where the money is..."


Richard
rdiam is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Limits of the Methodology?/ Cheap races BJennet General Discussion 77 06-12-2020 04:25 AM
Statement of Policy - Sartin Methodology Ted Craven Statement of Policy 0 08-06-2014 12:51 PM
Sartin Methodology Today (1998) - Audios Ted Craven Audio Collection 0 02-09-2012 09:02 PM
The Sartin Methodology Library and Bookstore Ted Craven General Discussion 0 10-06-2009 03:35 PM
Poll Question shoeless General Discussion 28 09-01-2008 09:36 PM


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:23 PM.