Time for some help

[Bill V.]

Originally Posted by mikesal57

I thought there was somewhere that said software and match-up dont mix..

I might be wrong...

Good afternoon Mike
As Charlie nicely suggest the library if full of excellent tutorial seminar clips. By Jim Bradshaw and his oklahoma mafia in most or not all of them he begins saying I don't use software but you should. What you heard was when. Hat was working with us in the hat check area. The option. presented was to work the match up with out software.
When I went to visit Jim and we went to the. Offsite betting parlor he even though he taught me for 3 days using just the DRF he asked me to use software when we went to bet toget


her

[mikesal57]

Thxs Bill...

I know JB was part in the development of the various softwares

But what did he prefer??

Like I said before, our library is GREAT.. but for someone coming in fresh ..it can be confusing with all the different people and there ways of using the methodology

mike

[Bill V.]

I think that not only do you need to read and listen to the material
I think the way you read hear and look at Doc is vital

If you read and listen with an attitude of "I know how to win"
"Let me see what this guy is all about" you will read and hear things differently
than somebody who reads the exact same material but with a attitude
"I have failed.. "I am coming to you because You can help me"

and if you ever came to Doc in person and told him
"I have failed.. "I am coming to you because You can help me"
As he was yelling at you you could hear the passion to try to help
you in his voice

He wrote what he believed was what was needed to help
non winners become winners Many "winners already" find the material
full of holes and take delight in making more holes

The follow ups are bi monthly journals that span over 25 years
Once a new comer fully understand # 70 -88
If they a go back and read the yellow manual the Match up manual or
any of them they need to realize they are reading things that happened
to work at that time the R in Pirco stands for research
They were always building and improving programs
What came before is the base for what came after .
There are parts of energy in RDSS but when energy was the program
There was no RDSS if that makes sense

Jim never said what he liked he did tell me what he didn't
How is that for a JB answer

[jma1143]

Top of the mprnin.

First time posting a thread. Been a follower(member) of the Methodology since the early 80's.

Thought I might add my two cents to the forgone discussion.

I am basically a Matcher in handicapping. Prefer manuel input over downloading pp's. I owe all my handicapping skills to the Methodolgy.

Much has been said in this thread of what Doc said and was in print in the Followups.

Regardings stats published from testing of programs, do u really believe that all those programs sold by the Methodology was thorouhly tested before being released to members?

Maybe somewhat at the early stages, but let's be honest, I think somewhere
along the line selling of programs was foremost.

I frequent the races with a gentleman Doc brought on board in the early 90's to be a guest lecturer at the Seminars. He also, was given by Doc programs to test and provide feed back. He told me, he often advised Doc of glitches in various programs and advised Doc the program(s) should not be released.

Doc completely ignored his advice, consequently there was an influx of faulty program returns.

Also, another Sartin alumnus who was close to Guy Wadsworth, asked him if Doc ever conducted detailed testing of TM variant with the Methodology programs?
Wadsworth,laughed.

I say all this to say, what u read in print, ain't necessarily so.

[Bill V.]

Thank you for your opinion. I say that look at the volume
Of positives. No business or professional therapist goes 25 plus years. Without a few unsatisfied. Customers or clients and no business goes 25 years with out dealing with slander or disgruntled employees. As your friend and guy wadsworth may or may not have been