new pace - Pace and Cap

gl45 · 07-13-2011, 12:18 PM

MNR last year meet. A little study just for fun.

Ted Craven · 07-13-2011, 12:26 PM

Pino,

The last 3 lines seem promising (overall net 29% ROI). As for the rest of the report, any chance of presenting it in a spreadsheet format? The columns and headings are quite misaligned and difficult to read.

Ted

gl45 · 07-13-2011, 02:05 PM

mnr 2010 meet

Ted Craven · 07-13-2011, 03:25 PM

Pino,

I did a bit of a mash-up of the 2 documents you posted, and rearranged a few rows. Is this information in this picture correct, and the explanations what you meant? If so, I can re-post the excel sheet this came from.

Ted

Name: mnr2010-np-study.png
Views: 455
Size: 51.9 KB

Name: mnr2010-np-study.png
Views: 455
Size: 51.9 KB

Here's the modified spreadsheet: mnr2010meet-a.xls

Thanks Pino!

gl45 · 07-13-2011, 04:24 PM

that's fine
txs

Dave Schwartz · 07-14-2011, 12:40 PM

If I am understanding this right, you use NewPace to get the contenders then use the selected pacelines to split them?

Regards,
Dave Schwartz

Ted Craven · 07-17-2011, 02:07 PM

Race 6, why is L2 #6 and not #7? #7 has a higher Low SR than #6 (69 vs 63). Favourite?

Race 10, could you explain the tied-break process you used to choose the #6 and #8 as L1 and L2, and not the other Late horses (all tied or separated by 1 point of Low SR).

Thanks Pino!

Ted

gl45 · 07-17-2011, 02:38 PM

#6 has higher High, better rider and is a fav.

gl45 · 07-17-2011, 02:50 PM

Ted,
Horses seems to run toward higher rating, unless are in the race for a workout
#6 and #8 have higher High than the other late horses. I always choose the higher to select the contenders.

Ted Craven · 07-17-2011, 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gl45

I always choose the higher to select the contenders.

For Late contenders, you select from the Hi SR sort, rather than the (recommended) Low SR sort? Was this the approach you took in your 2010 MNR study?

Thanks,

Ted

07-13-2011, 12:26 PM	#2
Ted Craven Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada Posts: 9,258	Pino, The last 3 lines seem promising (overall net 29% ROI). As for the rest of the report, any chance of presenting it in a spreadsheet format? The columns and headings are quite misaligned and difficult to read. Ted __________________ RDSS - Racing Decision Support System™

07-13-2011, 03:25 PM	#4
Ted Craven Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada Posts: 9,258	Pino, I did a bit of a mash-up of the 2 documents you posted, and rearranged a few rows. Is this information in this picture correct, and the explanations what you meant? If so, I can re-post the excel sheet this came from. Ted Here's the modified spreadsheet: mnr2010meet-a.xls Thanks Pino! __________________ RDSS - Racing Decision Support System™ Last edited by Ted Craven; 07-13-2011 at 05:16 PM.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Saturday Collective/ Positional on the lead projected pace races	RichieP	Matchup Discussion	92	06-07-2009 05:39 PM
Jim Bradshaw's 5 Step Approach to learning the Matchup	RichieP	Hat Check - How Can We Help You?	1	05-25-2009 10:52 AM
Slow early pace	Tim Y	Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum	7	02-23-2009 01:21 PM
Other than Early - Voodoo pattern #1	RichieP	Hat Check - How Can We Help You?	14	08-29-2008 11:08 AM
Unusual Pace Matchup Questions Closers	horsecharles	Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum	0	08-06-2008 12:15 AM

07-13-2011, 04:24 PM	#5
gl45 Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 878	that's fine txs

07-14-2011, 12:40 PM	#6
Dave Schwartz Grade 1 Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Reno, NV Posts: 119	If I am understanding this right, you use NewPace to get the contenders then use the selected pacelines to split them? Regards, Dave Schwartz __________________ The Horse Handicapping Authority .com email address: DaveSchwReno@Gmail.com Facebook: Talking Handicapping

07-17-2011, 02:07 PM	#7
Ted Craven Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada Posts: 9,258	Race 6, why is L2 #6 and not #7? #7 has a higher Low SR than #6 (69 vs 63). Favourite? Race 10, could you explain the tied-break process you used to choose the #6 and #8 as L1 and L2, and not the other Late horses (all tied or separated by 1 point of Low SR). Thanks Pino! Ted __________________ RDSS - Racing Decision Support System™

07-17-2011, 02:38 PM	#8
gl45 Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 878	#6 has higher High, better rider and is a fav.

07-17-2011, 02:50 PM	#9
gl45 Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 878	Ted, Horses seems to run toward higher rating, unless are in the race for a workout #6 and #8 have higher High than the other late horses. I always choose the higher to select the contenders.