Go Back   Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up > Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...) > Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum
Get RDSS
Google Site Search Get RDSS Sartin Library RDSS FAQs Conduct Register Site FAQ Members List Today's Posts

Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum General Handicapping Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-14-2008, 01:38 PM   #1
Tim Y
turf historian
 
Tim Y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,455
2nd call says it all

This post does not represent to true Sartin Methodology
This is just an opinion . To fully understand and win using the Sartin Methodology
Please read and fully understand the various manuals in our library


Here is the original post This is not the Sartin Methodology
________________________________________________________________________________________________

The original "truck" drivers found the 2nd call was a stand alone factor along with SP (2nd call and final fraction).

Teaching members continually promoted that fact that the 2nd call was as little as mid 50's percent of the race at 7 furlongs up to 75% of the race at a mile, enlightening hundreds to these heretofore "hidden" facts. Over and over, articles in the Follow Up promoted that point in the race where the various combatants went eye to eye, also referred to as "mano a mano" to the point (2nd call) where the race was determined. The FOCAL point of the entire contest.

When ENERGY came out and revolutionized the way we look at the races, it was percent median of total energy (2nd call percentage of the total) that defined the relative styles of Early, Early/Presser, Presser, Sustained/Presser, Sustained and Late. This, 2nd call determinate, was used by this poster to discover how some horses are going off form and some younger horses will no project to the longer classical distances all by the median percentage rising.

The concept of deceleration (which aides in deciding the best closer in the many turf contests) is the ratio of 2nd call to final fraction.

EPR=2nd call TPR=2nd call and final fraction (I am not privy to the various EXACT patented mathematical variations on these).

I would make a guess that fractal are based strongly on second call as I know that E/Ep and L/Ep are different manifestations of EPR and LPR.

The factor the entire methodology rests on:2nd call
__________________
Albert Einstein:"The monotony and solitude of a quiet life stimulates the creative mind."

Last edited by Bill V.; 12-15-2008 at 03:46 AM.
Tim Y is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Power Lines vs.1st call RichieP Hat Check - How Can We Help You? 3 12-02-2008 10:39 AM
Data Base - MatchUp Question Turbulator Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum 45 11-17-2008 01:07 AM
1ST call times mikesal57 Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum 62 11-03-2008 04:21 PM
Other than Early - Voodoo pattern #1 RichieP Hat Check - How Can We Help You? 14 08-29-2008 11:08 AM
Our Phone call to Doc Sartin Bill V. 2008 3 08-19-2008 05:39 PM


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:18 PM.