|
Pook the reason I'm not in M4$ it is that I'm not a matchup guy. I'm well aware of its concepts and having tried it realize my limitations. Very few can employ it on any consistent winning basis. The number that can vs. those that can't is a huge gap.
The matchup was included in Sartin later programs by the Doc. In the readouts in RDSS the matchup is included and on a consistent basis by a computer program which can outperform me and most who attempt to mimic "The Hat". One should know their capabilities and limitations. Oh I suppose I could enter and do what I normally do and throw some matchup stuff up there for justification but it wouldn't be what Jimmy did or what you guys are trying to achieve.
I have no problem posting picks and I'm not embarrassed at all by a lost. I don't red board, nobody gets them all. Before the fact is where the rubber meets the road.If it were a different format I would have no problem with a competition or one for money. At a minimum it would sharpen ones skills. My time is limited but I try to participate whenever possible.
Some of my analysis for that race came more from my knowledge of the old Entropy program and or deceleration rather than the matchup per say. From what I see most matchup guys don't carry the race into the 3rd FR which is the most difficult part so they ignore it. Most not all that is. Some analysis came from reviewing the horses chart beyond just picking a line.
Mitch44
Last edited by Mitch44; 04-16-2016 at 02:49 PM.
|