MPH Pro as an Adjunct

[MikeB]

Originally Posted by Rivegauche610

P.S. I have no connection to BRIS, but their Ultimate PPs are so data-intensive and thorough that I can't and won't break away from them. I feel they and RDSS can play nicely together, and in my case, they do. Especially helpful is the Race Summary page. I admit to a proclivity to the printed page, so I print my PPs (two sided, of course) and study the information thereon before using MPH Pro and RDSS. It is a long process, perhaps, but I enjoy the analysis. It keeps me out of more trouble and my wonderful wife actually encourages this hobby of mine because even winning a modest exacta makes me happy as hell! It isn't the money as much as it is having been right!

I use RDSS and BRIS also. I don't know which way you print yours double sided, but I print the first half of the card single sided then flip that stack over and print the second half. That way I can spread out all the pages of a race side by side. Comparing all of the races of one horse against all of the races of another is too awkward in the RDSS software.

As a minor gripe, the Trackmaster PPs does a lousy job of assigning ESP running styles. BRIS does it right and saves me the time of having to go through the Trackmaster PPs and correct them.