|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Google Site Search | Get RDSSGet RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
| General Discussion General Horse Racing Discussion |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#5 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: The Villages, Fl.
Posts: 3,872
|
What I've found is that its true the percentage of wins do go down in turf races. However that's do to the make up of the horses within that race. In other words there are many more unknown factors in turf races in that they contain many FTS on turf and unproven to the conditions of the race.
My experience is that if they all are proven with 3 turf starts and 3 at the distance structure they are very playable races. Those that insist on playing dirt races that are MSW or young horses with fewer than 3 at the surface and distance will destroy their win percentage also by as much as 15%. My point is that its not the surface or distance but the make up of the race and the unknown factors within that race makeup that destroys a bankroll. Like RichieP I find many turf races that are profitable. Mitch44 Last edited by Mitch44; 11-25-2016 at 10:13 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Win8/MS Surface Tablet | wagercapper | RDSS2 / FAQ's | 39 | 05-27-2015 01:03 PM |
| Conflicting Infomation and no color, ?? | pktruckdriver | General Discussion | 5 | 12-07-2012 06:11 PM |
| Santa Anita Eyes Dirt Surface | fasteddy | General Discussion | 0 | 05-22-2010 07:13 PM |
| Surface & Mode Changes | bobp | RDSS | 1 | 04-15-2009 10:10 AM |
|