|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Google Site Search | Get RDSSGet RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
| Matchup Discussion Matchup Discussion and Practice |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#8 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Loretto, Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,847
|
I have been looking for races with absolutely no 1st's at the first call anywhere in the PP's for any horse. Maybe too stringent. Last Saturday your race had a horse with an ancient 1st call and that worked in a paceless way.
Here is how I would approach the no pace Delaware 2 on Saturday. Kind of a hybrid thing. Narrow the contenders and select pacelines: Could only throw the 1 out. Don't try to project the pace. Let RDSS show who may be in front at the first call. From this screen: Attachment 44375 From what Jim wrote about these paceless horses toss out the two in front who are closely matched - the 2 and 4. Attachment 44376 Of the remaining, which look to be in their positional comfort zone in a winning race? Looks like the 3,5 to me. 6 wouldn't be out of the question. As confirmed by these screens: Attachment 44377 So at this point using RDSS tools and the Matchup approach to a paceless race we are on the 3,5. I think. Anybody chime in with their thoughts. Would you try to project the pace? Pook Last edited by The Pook; 09-23-2017 at 09:52 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 20 Race Cycles - For Beginners and Old Alike | Because I Can Jim | Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...) | 1 | 04-13-2017 04:56 PM |
| Non winner of 2 lifetime races | Bill Lyster | General Discussion | 21 | 06-29-2015 01:25 AM |
| 8 Month Matchup Thread (Re-posted) | Bill Lyster | Matchup Discussion | 4 | 05-01-2015 06:02 PM |
| FTL - Race Conditions | NeedForSpeed | Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum | 15 | 06-17-2013 10:18 PM |
| Review of TAM 4th 12.19.12 | For The Lead | Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...) | 5 | 12-20-2012 11:23 AM |
|