|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Google Site Search | Get RDSSGet RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
| Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...) Interactive Teaching & Learning - Race Conditions, Contenders, Pacelines, Advanced Concepts, Betting ... |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 |
|
The egg man
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 10,005
|
thanks
Well said Mitch in regards to pace line selections
Using a horses last 3 or 4 line to rate the last line, as the last line is the best indicator of current form is vital. Tim, I'm glad we are on the same page If a horse has failed 2 times at Alw N1x I can see where Doc's guidelines would be in play. However in this chase I hope you can, I think you would agree, You can understand Mitch and my viewpoint that is ,Ask yourself, What else is the trainer suppose to do? Why punish the horse just because she not only won here NW1X condition, She won without using close to the total energy she used as a FTS. Again age sex and recency play a big part in advance pace line selections BUT Preceptor and the adjusted speed rating and the match do too. For Doc It was first a formost - the adjusted speed ratings. Then when there was a question as to which of the last 3 races was best. Doc developed the F6 paceline indicator in Validator, Ted drilled into this F6 key value and discovered it was the horse with the lower preceptor line score readout which highlighted to paceline ranked best. So in theory Doc's guidelines were to use the best preceptor of the last 3 or 4 races at a comparable distance surface and competition lever Compition level being total energy . Bill |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Class Still Matters | vderdak | Races of Interest | 3 | 03-10-2013 08:58 PM |
|