|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Google Site Search | Get RDSSGet RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
| General Discussion General Horse Racing Discussion |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#4 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Escondido CA just 25 minutes from where the turf meets the surf - "...at Del Mar"
Posts: 2,509
|
Well, i might take exception to your response.
In race 8 Saturday for instance, #1 POGO had listed Timeform ratings of 118-116-107-106 whereas the TM ratings for the same races were 118-117-116-113. DREAM TF = none for last race, 107-104, but TM ratings were 129-116-109. The winner MODERN 120 - no info - 122 vs TM 122-120-119. In race 10 Rebels Romance did not have a Timeform rating in its last two races. Starting on 7/29 the next 4 TF ratings were 120-119-74-80, In RDSS these 4 races had the following numbers - 112-104-60-74!! So there is some basis to dispute what the real TIMEFORM rating might be. I suppose the RDSS representation could reflect an update TF rating, but that is unknown at this time. What do you think? |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| RDSS Error Message - Data Centre | Ted Craven | General Discussion | 11 | 09-04-2015 11:09 PM |
| How to obtain RDSS, get started and learn to use it. | Ted Craven | RDSS Info, Reference | 4 | 04-16-2013 07:46 PM |
| Bad RDSS Race Data for several Euro Horses | Ted Craven | 2011 | 2 | 11-03-2011 04:24 PM |
| RDSS Data Management | alydar_ David | RDSS | 5 | 09-23-2010 07:38 PM |
|