Looking at Tims PL/BPP findings using the Database Ted has posted

[MJS6916]

Originally Posted by AwesomeAgain

In all fairness, let’s not get carried away with that nonsense.

RDSS users are not wandering around in the dark waiting for Profit Line and Prime Power to rescue them from ignorance. RDSS still has NewPace, BL/BL, V/DC, Total Energy, TPR, deceleration, %Median, EPR, LPR, FW, FX, paceline structure, velocity interpretation, and the entire Sartin framework under the hood.

Profit Line and Brisnet Prime Power are useful. Nobody with a working brain is denying that. But let’s not confuse added intelligence with life support.

PL and BPP are outside confirmation tools. They are a bonus layer. They can sharpen the picture, expose contenders, and challenge what the internal readouts are saying. Great. That still does not mean RDSS collapses without them.

The foundation is still pace, velocity, energy, pressure, distribution, deceleration, and matchup interpretation. That is the engine. That is the methodology. That is the work.

So no, RDSS users would not “lack valuable insights” without Brisnet. They would lack two useful outside opinions. Big difference. Profit line and Prime Power add value. They do not carry the building.

Thank you for this AwesomeAgain.

No one is turning their brain off due
to the existence of Profit Line and BPP.

Mike

[stormbringer]

I"M THICK
HORSE AS FOLLOWS

PL. BPP

A. 1. 2

B. 2. 1

C. 3 -

D. 4. 3



or is this right


PL BPP

1. 1. 2

2. 2. 1

3. 3. 3

OR IS THIS WHAT YOU MEAN ??


PL. BPP

1. 1 1

2. 2. 2

3 3. 3



IS ANY OF THIS RIGHT WHAT YOU Are
REFERRING TO (for those that have and Arkansas education ?)

[kahunab]

Either of the last two examples meet the criteria.

Horse PL BPP
A 1 1
B 2 2
c 3 3

OR

A 3 1
B 2 3
C 1 2

The criteria is met when the top 3 horses in PL are the top 3 in BPP and vice versa,

Hope that helps,

[stormbringer]

Thanks! That what i needed