Synergism4 CT 6TH 5\16

[shoeless]

Left to right screen 1 is the entry screen

Screen 2 I look at the SCBL to see if any gaps, or
if horses are bunched up. This can help me to determine
if early or late. As you can see horse 2 should have a nice lead

Screen 3 This is the screen FOR ME that I concentrate on the
most with the TPR'S. You can see that 2 &3 are tied with total energy.
but that the 2 has a big lead on the EFR. Also notice the diff and see how it favors the 2,at this juncture the 1 is a non contender.

Screen 4 is the ranking screen, a lot of people go straight to this but
I don't

[shoeless]

In conclusion

I am not a master of using this program, but this is way I
do it

For more on TPR look at the FU'S or get a copy of Pace Makes the Race

I know the tape is for regular Synergism but listen to the last tape.

Doc does a really good job of interpreting the numbers

Hope this Helps

Jeff

[DanBoals]

Hey Jeff

RDSS has a PMTR/TPR screen that to my knowledge, is the same as old.
Benefit is, all the work is done for you.
Minus is that you have to subscribe to RDSS and purchase Trackmaster download.

In the old Yellow Manual, the Phase 3 book that Ted still has here on the site, Howard goes thru and tells you the approximate percentages of win chance of all the combos

this is a quick recap - keep in mind, this data is 40+ years old
1-1-1 equals 50.1%, so a horse that is top epr, top lpr and top tpr
1-1-2 equals 43%
1-1-x equals 38.4%
1-2-2 equals 36%
2-2-2 equals 34%
1-2-x equals 33%
2-2-x equals 30.1%
1-x-x equals 30%
3-3-x equals 28%
3-3-3 equlas 26% ===> I think this is a typo, how would it be lower than 3-3-5 for example
2-x-x equals 24%

Anyways, it is supposed to give an idea of how strong or weak the horse is
Keep in mind, Howard recommended if the 1's and 2's are spread over more than 4 horses to strongly consider passing the race.

Hope this helps

[shoeless]

Thanks again Dan for your help

Jeff

[DanBoals]

Thank you Jeff for keeping this history of the methodology alive.

You seem to be the singular driving force that reminds us of our past and why these concepts are still effective today.

[Lt1]

Why stay on the past when we have a bright future with RDSS?.
Tim

[shoeless]

LT1,

You are absolutely right and nobody is saying here that Ted has not
done a great job with RDSS.

But let's face it not everybody can afford using RDSS especially
in the times we are having now with the economy.

Ray has been the driving force here showing that it is possible to
win with the older programs.

I do have RDSS and still sitting on 20 cards I bought. I get confused with all of those screens and the older programs
are easier for me to comprehend.

I am hoping others will join in here with their thoughts.

I almost forgot that I had promised Bill V I would keep this site alive, it was his baby

Jeff

[shoeless]

Thanks Dan let's just say I was 4th in command and now I'm it.

If people are smart you would look up

Bill V
Pino
Richie P
Partsnuts
For the lead

These guys knew what they were doing.

Jeff

[raceman5]

Originally Posted by shoeless

Thanks Dan let's just say I was 4th in command and now I'm it.

If people are smart you would look up

Bill V
Pino
Richie P
Partsnuts
For the lead

These guys knew what they were doing.

Jeff

And your doing a hell of a GREAT!!! job Jeff keeping the site alive

Bob

[shoeless]

Thanks, Bob really appreciate it

Jeff