Valm Question

[admin]

here is the results of the race you sent me


Yes # six won and Its last few races were bad
but compared to the field it ran agains
this race was a case of 50/50
If you go back to the back class The horse is
all over the readouts if not You lose the race

I will stand by Doc's basic instructions FOREVER
and Match up against your insanity

Nobdy in the race from AQU010507 could run to that pace the 6 could when it was in form in races 4 5 6 and 8 9 A

[tompkins]

How many times have we had the same disagreement and it NEVER makes it into your consciousness? There remains NO one way to use these programs, there never has there NEVER will be.

Because you cannot see the winner here by your STATIC RIGID methods, does not means others cannot.

The program is a tool. Some use it one way, others with another mechanism. It is not just the way you use it that is right. Whomever gets the winner gets it right. You have to constantly adapt to what the track on that day gives you. It is NEVER static.

[admin]

Here is the BLBL from your horse 6 winner


Race: 5 Win Place Show
1st 6 HOOSICK FALLS 22.40 11.60 6.60
2nd 5 GONE GOODBYE 5.30 4.20
3rd 7 SCATKEY 3.80
4th 1a WILLI'S SWEET GIRL
$2 Exacta 6-5 102.50
$2 Trifecta 6-5-7 297.50
Refunds: 4,8
$2 Pick 3 1/9/6 3 of 3 449.00
$2 Pick 4 2,3/1/9/6 4 of 4 726.00

[tompkins]

well good Retro-fit going back 5 lines and 131 days........One can find the winner on recency if you looked at the pace of the race this one found it's last several vs. what the pace was the day it won.

The screen capture I sent had the lines I used highlighted did it not?

[admin]

But this has nothing to do with a program
This hores is a case of form. If it runs to that form and you follow directions you lose
If you pick spots like this and play this way
your win percent will be low your ave win price will be high This is about a methodology and programs
You are not using the program to get this winner
so why post it in this area on this board

[tompkins]

The program told me that this one, ON the speed favoring inner, would be alone on the lead. THAT is what happened: that is what the PROGRAM told me.

You seem to forget that the ORIGINAL Pirco group found only ONE stand alone factor that produced significant winners and that was velocity to the 2nd call. THAT is what the program found.

In this case, as with many, I use TWO programs

[admin]

very true you sent me this screen shot Fro Speculator
all I can see is that you have poor skills in screen capturing and
that you used lines 2 and 3

I am posting your exact screenshot that you sent me
Then i will enter those lines into validator
and we will see

[admin]

I apologize you are correct
I salso apologize for my comments
The second line does rate tied for third with
the 3 horse
would I bet it No

hey as I have said
really all that matters is that I improve
each 20 race cycle
Thanks for the lesson

[tompkins]

The fellow who keeps pushing the best of last three CHANGES the rules when they don't fit the discussion. The choice of those lines represented the HORSE today not 131 days ago. That current data got the winner.

The entire idea of this was to show one can find winners, from recent lines, when they were beaten greater that some arbitrary 7.5 lengths.

Winner found a different way. Different ways like there are different interpretations of dances, music, how to drive, how to sing etc. etc.....

[admin]

FYI
horse 1