|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Google Site Search | Get RDSSGet RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
| Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum General Handicapping Discussion |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#7 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 131
|
I only look at the last 4 races per horse. One of these lines will either have the winner in it or you won't get it anyways.If you feel that the top 4 races don't represent the horse how do you choose between lines 5 thru 10???.Most likely doing this will only result in error and won't boost your bottom line anyways. If you do feel the need to go back further atleast first ask yourself WHY? and then ONLY if you can find a GOOD reason to go back further then proceed.Don't do it just becouse.
The more variables you can eliminate the easier it becomes to being a profitable player.Years ago I felt the NEED to have a complicated method to beat the game, becouse I was more interested in being seen as some rocket science impressing my friends with scientific mumbo jumbo, the only problem was that I always lost money. After I chucked it all and found a keep it extremely simple approach I made money and lots of it. Good luck. Mike. |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sunday Sept 21 | mikesal57 | Selections | 3 | 09-21-2008 03:07 PM |
| Pick Three Betting Strategy | Turbulator | Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum | 9 | 09-07-2008 07:07 PM |
| Travers Stakes Analysis and Observations | Turbulator | Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum | 1 | 08-24-2008 09:36 AM |
| Thinking Back | shoeless | Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum | 1 | 08-21-2008 08:53 AM |
| Question for Bill and Ted et al | Turbulator | RDSS | 10 | 08-08-2008 07:20 AM |
|