|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Google Site Search | Get RDSSGet RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
| RDSS2 / FAQ's Information, discussion, screenshots, videos about the upcoming version, FAQ's |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#3 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 9,242
|
Richard,
I cleaned up the layout. Thank you very much for reporting this. This confirms some of what my own experience is, and that of several folks who seem reluctant to post it online. One of the most important attributes of NewPace, IMO, is that it is automated - you push a button and 4 contenders appear. With the rest of RDSS and the Methodology, you have to push a few more buttons and use your brain to get the contenders. Doing so, at minimum, does not give you worse results. Then, with either approach, you begin making betting decisions. Are you able to elaborate on the relative profitability of the 2 approaches to getting contenders, using a common betting strategy? Thanks again for this work! Ted P.S. I moved this thread out of the Testing Forum
__________________
RDSS - Racing Decision Support System™ Last edited by Ted Craven; 08-06-2011 at 04:23 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ** NewPace in RDSS 2.0 ** | Ted Craven | RDSS2 / FAQ's | 16 | 09-04-2014 03:10 PM |
| Tampa R6 4/24 | SilentRun | RDSS | 6 | 04-26-2010 01:19 PM |
| Daily Racing Form Abbreviated Race Conditions | For The Lead | Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum | 1 | 11-12-2009 03:15 AM |
| Score Board | Bill V. | Golf Shirt Contest | 6 | 10-10-2009 03:19 PM |
| Jim Bradshaw's 5 Step Approach to learning the Matchup | RichieP | Hat Check - How Can We Help You? | 1 | 05-25-2009 09:52 AM |
|