Go Back   Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up > General Discussion
Google Site Search Get RDSS Sartin Library RDSS FAQs Conduct Register Site FAQ Members List Today's Posts

General Discussion General Horse Racing Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-08-2009, 02:23 AM   #11
For The Lead
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ted Craven View Post
Bluewaterbill,

There are lots of different possible scenarios for going back, but I try to use a few principles:

1. a horse runs as fast as it needs to, not as fast as it can
2. err on the side of recency
3. don't mix surfaces unless there's no choice (then have confidence in your ITV figs)
4. don't mix distance structures unless you have no choice (also with ITV confidence)
5. for Turf races only, consider using good lines from the entire PP set (if the horse seems fit today)

Ted
With regard to item #4 on the above list, are you speaking of sprint lines in route races, route lines in sprint races, or sprint lines in sprint races and route lines in route races?
i.e.- 5.5f to 7f, 7f to 6f and etc.
8.0f to 8.5f, 8.5f to 8.3f and etc.
Many times you will find that a horse who runs early at 7f will run as a presser or sustained when turned back to 5.5f or 6f, as just one example.
For The Lead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 07:46 AM   #12
shoeless
Grade 1
 
shoeless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,161
George Kaywood, a respected handicapper from Kansas City backs up a contention I have long held: "Reliance on a single pace lines is the biggest error in pace evaluation."




Dr.Hugo Z Hackenbush a well respected handicapper says use whatever works for you not what works for others
shoeless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 11:11 AM   #13
Ted Craven
Grade 1
 
Ted Craven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 8,878
Quote:
Originally Posted by For The Lead View Post
With regard to item #4 on the above list, are you speaking of sprint lines in route races, route lines in sprint races, or sprint lines in sprint races and route lines in route races?
i.e.- 5.5f to 7f, 7f to 6f and etc.
8.0f to 8.5f, 8.5f to 8.3f and etc.
Many times you will find that a horse who runs early at 7f will run as a presser or sustained when turned back to 5.5f or 6f, as just one example.
FTL,

I was referring to sprint lines in route races, or route lines in sprint races. If today is a route and a horse has recent decent sprint lines and recent so-so route lines, I'd err on the side of representing it from the routes rather than the sprints, unless much older performance shows it has run better in routes, when fit, than recently, and recent sprint lines project well and show a more later energy disbursement balance.

If today is a sprint and I have only recent routes, I'll give it a go to see if there is some brilliant early speed - but I am usually dubious about such a scenario for the win (though in-the-money should not be excluded).

Again, as a principle, when possible, I'd try to minimize the distance equalization required. I guess that means I'd prefer projecting a 7f in a 8f route to using a 6f or 5.5f line. I can appreciate that a 7f line turned back to a 6f or shorter could change the energy distribution, but if there's nothing else to go on, I use it. Over the great number of events, I personally prefer the consistency that regular projection/extraction routines provide me, or the other line selection principles (along with using Total Energies and Speed Ratings, which I didn't discuss) - to trusting myself with a jazz approach (one time this, next time that). A traffic cop or board of governors on method, if you will. I'm sure there are many levels of finesse possible here, and some may possess a more refined tool box.

Ted
__________________

R
DSS -
Racing Decision Support System™
Ted Craven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 06:43 PM   #14
shoeless
Grade 1
 
shoeless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,161
Tim,This George Kaywood you keep referring to is it the same guy that Doc talks about in the seminar tapes that was pirating his programs

Ted Adds: JEFF - Just knock it off re Kaywood, OK. Please. No point.

Last edited by Ted Craven; 04-08-2009 at 07:49 PM. Reason: Off topic, and unnecessary. Let's move on...
shoeless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 09:35 PM   #15
Charlie D
Match Up Apprentice
 
Charlie D's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by shoeless View Post



Dr.Hugo Z Hackenbush a well respected handicapper says use whatever works for you not what works for others


Mr Pizzola stated creative thinking, i think. Hat stated there is more than one way, i think and Dr Howard Sartin stated on Page 1 of The Dynamics of Incremental Velocity and Energy Exertion Manual. There is NO SINGLE BEST WAY to handicap a thoroughbred race. There is no RIGHT way. There is no WRONG way. There is only the successful or unsuccessful way as measured by......



There are no RULES, only guidelines....... Jim "The Hat" Bradshaw, Match Up Manual.

This is NOT a recipe book......Dr Howard Sartin, The Yellow Manual

Seems some handicapping Legends are singing from same song book as Dr Hugo Z Hackenbush
__________________
"To me, The Match Up supercedes everything"

Last edited by Charlie D; 04-08-2009 at 09:45 PM.
Charlie D is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best CPR Paceline.... Charlie D RDSS 36 10-20-2008 04:28 PM
How far back?? grahors Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum 14 10-09-2008 04:11 AM
paceline: beaten lengths wgrotey Classic Sartin Programs - Support, Discussion 5 09-08-2008 01:42 PM
Paceline Selection Questions mikesal57 Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum 7 08-16-2008 11:56 AM
Paceline selection AAcoolguy General Discussion 44 07-27-2008 08:42 AM


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:37 AM.