Go Back   Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up > RDSS - Leverage/Pace
Get RDSS
Google Site Search Get RDSS Sartin Library RDSS FAQs Conduct Register Site FAQ Members List Today's Posts

RDSS - Leverage/Pace Discussion about a NEW RDSS approach to identifying Key Contenders, the Pace Bias and a structured betting approach

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-12-2025, 09:10 PM   #1
MM42
AlwNW1X
 
Join Date: Mar 2025
Posts: 13
Double Race 11/12 at Oaklawn

I have been working the data for about 2 weeks now. A lot of trial and error. After a meeting with Dick today, I felt way more comfortable. I was down about 100 today with multiple seconds on some W bets and double bets. I finally found my spot to lay it in (cautiously lol). Race 11 was a guarantee with Thorpedo Anna (based on data/PPs etc). In race 12, my two horses were the 1 & 9. My initial thought was to play two $40 dollar doubles, 6/1,9 (which is my normal betting style for doubles). However, still testing the data I just used the 9. I thought the 1 was going to be a little farther back than the 9 (EP3). Why the 9? I really leaned on the RS column in this race. I noticed there was 4 horses with a E5 and above. I was expecting a fast/pressured pace (20 RS). I noticed the 9s running style was an EP6. I was hoping the 9 would stalk 3rd or 4th and close in. That is exactly what happened, 9 was 4th and then gradually came into second and finally took the lead in the stretch. This horse was also the 2nd ranked late NP horse. From a handicapping perspective, I also liked this race was second off layoff.

6/9 $40 double x $13.70 = $548

Marc
Attached Images
 
MM42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2025, 10:24 PM   #2
kahunab
Grade 1
 
kahunab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 330
Good Job, Marc! It was fun to meet you this morning on Zoom! Great read.

Dick
__________________
Haakon 47


'Something magical happens when you bring together a group of people from different disciplines with a common purpose.' Mark Stefik Palo Alto Research Centre Fellow
kahunab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2025, 01:34 PM   #3
shoeless
Grade 1
 
shoeless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,655
Marc

Not really sure off the readouts how you came up with the 9,
great job in doing so

Jeff
shoeless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2025, 02:07 PM   #4
MM42
AlwNW1X
 
Join Date: Mar 2025
Posts: 13
Jeff,

I completely understand. I organized the top 5 RX figures. The 9 was the 5th RX total number. I then reviewed the RS column to review each racing style. The speed number was 20 (anticipating a fast/pressured pace). Above I mention, I thought the 4 was going to be 3rd or 4th stalking with the fast pace. It came out 4th, crept up to second and took the lead in the stretch. I was also going to use the 1 but I thought it would be too far back (which ultimately happened and couldn't close in). The 9 was the swinghorse on NP and the second best late (which I was looking for). From handicapping perspective, it was second off the layoff and had some good back class. Hope that makes sense!

Marc
MM42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2025, 02:53 PM   #5
shoeless
Grade 1
 
shoeless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,655
Marc

Thank you for the explanation and very good handicapping

Jeff
shoeless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2025, 04:56 PM   #6
Lt1
Grade 1
 
Lt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Valley Stream NY
Posts: 11,515
MM congrats on the score but I also have a question. On my version the favorite #1 ranked #5 RX with corollary support[ this remained the same whether I used my usual 100% DTV and changed pls or 50% DTV and left all pls as picked by the program and also was a key horse possibility] while the #9 was 6th with no support. On your screen shot the $1 also appears to have a higher ranking then the 9. Did you downgrade the #1 for cause>?
Tim
__________________
Trust but verify
Lt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2025, 06:09 PM   #7
MM42
AlwNW1X
 
Join Date: Mar 2025
Posts: 13
LT,

The screenshot I took I filtered by running style (that's why you see the #1 at the bottom). What I like to do is filter by top RX score and then I will filter by the running style to get an idea of how it may run. Hope that makes sense!

Marc
MM42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2025, 10:05 PM   #8
darmar
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Maple Ridge, B.C. Canada
Posts: 3,643
Hi Marc
First of all Congrats on your hit at Oaklawn yesterday. I capped that race 6 ways to Sunday after it was over and.couldn't get the 9 higher than 4th . Could you please post your winning ticket and your segments screenshot for more analysis.
Thanks Darryl
darmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2025, 10:18 AM   #9
Lt1
Grade 1
 
Lt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Valley Stream NY
Posts: 11,515
Hi Marc. Thanks for the response but the way I see your screen shot the 9 has the lowest RX score. What am I missing?
Tim
__________________
Trust but verify
Lt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2025, 03:46 PM   #10
Jake
Clean slate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 79
Marc,

I'm curious as well here. With the exception of the pace pressure gauge moving you toward the 9 horse as the possible late choice, the rest of the screen rankings for this horse seems very anti-leverage/pace, meaning you look to be fading the best win percentages that Kahunab complied and shared. A bit confusing here.

Jake
Jake is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FTL Paceline selection ? shoeless Pace Makes the Race / TPR Total Pace Ratings 160 08-26-2019 12:58 AM
Oaklawn Race 5 - Friday 2/9 Jeebs Selections 39 02-10-2018 12:54 PM
Just follow the guidelines For The Lead Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...) 143 03-23-2016 10:37 PM
Adjustments Question Ted Craven RDSS2 / FAQ's 3 06-29-2014 04:22 PM
Wagercapping - Follow Up Articles Ted Craven Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum 19 03-22-2010 06:06 PM


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:23 PM.