Big mistake - Pace and Cap

shoeless · 11-10-2026, 01:50 PM

Hi All

This is what I get for NOT listening to what the program tells me

shoeless · 11-10-2026, 02:00 PM

So you would look at the sustained horses the top 2 are 3 & 7

Result

3 wins 13.40

7 run 2nd at (14-1) 3-7 exacta 194.00

I only have myself to blame,I did put 1,4.5 on top of 7. Funny
thing is I was all happy I thought I hit it. I got the 3 & 4 confused about
it.

Hope Ray doesn't see this he will give me He** about it

I don't mind putting up my mistakes. hope others learn from it

Jeff

DanBoals · 11-10-2026, 02:25 PM

Hey Jeff

hope it is okay if i ask some questions
i am not an energy program user, so if this is dumb, please excuse it

i notice a LOT of the time you guys post these shots
that there are generally 2 horses, not 3, for the paragon A, paragon B and energizer
a lot of the time, one of the 2 wins - maybe not the one expected, but one of the 2

assuming you picked good contenders

why not bet the 2 horses from the paragon A,B,energizer
so in this case, the 1 and 3
over your other contenders 5,4,4,7

so 2 win bets for $10 each on the 1 and 3
and then a $2 exacta with 1,3/1,3,4,5,7

that would be an 8 bet or $16 exacta

my guess it would come down to how well you get the top 2 in your contenders as far as profitability

when i am feeling better, will go back thru the previous energy screen shots on the site and see what kind of percentage it shows

best of luck
dan

11-10-2026, 01:50 PM	#1
shoeless Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 4,658	Big mistake Hi All This is what I get for NOT listening to what the program tells me Attached Images

11-10-2026, 02:00 PM	#2
shoeless Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 4,658	So you would look at the sustained horses the top 2 are 3 & 7 Result 3 wins 13.40 7 run 2nd at (14-1) 3-7 exacta 194.00 I only have myself to blame,I did put 1,4.5 on top of 7. Funny thing is I was all happy I thought I hit it. I got the 3 & 4 confused about it. Hope Ray doesn't see this he will give me He** about it I don't mind putting up my mistakes. hope others learn from it Jeff Last edited by shoeless; 11-10-2026 at 02:03 PM.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Predictive Factors for Contenders	mick	RDSS Documentation -- All Versions	57	06-14-2018 06:49 PM
Nov 4, race 6 - bad Arc day Info	Bill Lyster	2011	11	11-03-2011 01:06 PM
Saratoga 9th	Bill Lyster	Selections	5	08-19-2011 09:00 PM
Wagercapping and Value	Houndog	Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum	19	02-19-2011 03:47 PM
Sunday 5/3	RichieP	Selections	27	05-03-2009 09:32 PM

11-10-2026, 02:25 PM	#3
DanBoals Grade 1 Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Reno, NV Posts: 456	Hey Jeff hope it is okay if i ask some questions i am not an energy program user, so if this is dumb, please excuse it i notice a LOT of the time you guys post these shots that there are generally 2 horses, not 3, for the paragon A, paragon B and energizer a lot of the time, one of the 2 wins - maybe not the one expected, but one of the 2 assuming you picked good contenders why not bet the 2 horses from the paragon A,B,energizer so in this case, the 1 and 3 over your other contenders 5,4,4,7 so 2 win bets for $10 each on the 1 and 3 and then a $2 exacta with 1,3/1,3,4,5,7 that would be an 8 bet or $16 exacta my guess it would come down to how well you get the top 2 in your contenders as far as profitability when i am feeling better, will go back thru the previous energy screen shots on the site and see what kind of percentage it shows best of luck dan