Go Back   Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up > Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...) > Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum
Get RDSS
Google Site Search Get RDSS Sartin Library RDSS FAQs Conduct Register Site FAQ Members List Today's Posts

Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum General Handicapping Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-30-2008, 08:43 PM   #1
shoeless
Grade 1
 
shoeless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,655
It's not the software

It's not the software that matters basically they are all the same,the horses and pacelines that you put in is what really counts.There was a race yesterday at Fort Erie where I didnt go deep enough into a horses pp's[Pino pointed ths out to me].After the race ended I went back and entered that line and darn if that horse didnt come out on top and he paid 20-1.I was guilty of this myself going from software to software when the one that was screwing up was myself.I hope none of you fall into this trap as I did.Jeff
shoeless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 09:23 PM   #2
noddub62
Budman
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 801
Hi Jeff,

What you said was so true. The paceline selection is, in my opinion, the single most importment item in handicapping.

Stay cool man. It's hot tamale hot here in Texas!

Bud
noddub62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 12:27 AM   #3
Charlie D
Match Up Apprentice
 
Charlie D's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,105
Quote:
Paceline selection is one of the most important components in handicapping.If you can select the true running line, you can win most of your wagers
Five Step Approach to The match Up by Jim "The Hat" Bradshaw




Select the right paceline and you should be able to elimate the pretenders in a race, which then leaves you with the "true" contenders


All you have to decide then is, are these "true" contenders a good investment
__________________
"To me, The Match Up supercedes everything"

Last edited by Charlie D; 07-01-2008 at 12:33 AM.
Charlie D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 02:16 AM   #4
Charlie D
Match Up Apprentice
 
Charlie D's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,105
Quote:
I concentrate on looking for reasons why they won't win, rather than reasons why they will win. Not surprisingly, these reasons are much easier to find
Against The Crowd by Alan Potts (UK Professional Punter)
__________________
"To me, The Match Up supercedes everything"

Last edited by Charlie D; 07-01-2008 at 02:33 AM.
Charlie D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 06:40 AM   #5
shoeless
Grade 1
 
shoeless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,655
Bud,It's been hot up here in the DC area ,stay cool as well and root for those Texas Rangers.Jeff
shoeless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 01:33 PM   #6
Tim Y
turf historian
 
Tim Y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,455
There is no uniform way of using the Match Up: it is a concept open to evaluation and application. "There are no rules" supports that contention all the more.
Tim Y is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 01:35 PM   #7
Tim Y
turf historian
 
Tim Y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,455
Quote:
Originally Posted by shoeless View Post
It's not the software that matters basically they are all the same,the horses and pacelines that you put in is what really counts.There was a race yesterday at Fort Erie where I didnt go deep enough into a horses pp's[Pino pointed ths out to me].After the race ended I went back and entered that line and darn if that horse didnt come out on top and he paid 20-1.I was guilty of this myself going from software to software when the one that was screwing up was myself.I hope none of you fall into this trap as I did.Jeff
THIS ia another reason why you have to get the flavor of each horse, not to mention the FORM cycle, by using multiple lines for each.

Once you get an idea of the contenders, go back through to see if the proposed paceline was an abberation or another example of how the horse naturally responds to pace pressure. ALSO, very important, to LEAVE OUT pace lines that were far too slow early: another abberation that will give skewed results since those lines make the horse look better than they should since they had little pressure early and more "gas in the tank" late.

Last edited by Tim Y; 07-01-2008 at 01:40 PM.
Tim Y is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 06:10 PM   #8
horsingaround
Maiden
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2
Hey Shoeless,

Don't be so hard on yourself in picking or not picking a paceline. If this horse was 20-1, i'm guessing his form was off, or appeared off. So was there any reason or reasons to go back to the paceline you reffered to? Was there any reason to believe this horse would revert to that paceline again at this time? I guess what i'm trying to get across is this, depending on what criteria your using to pick the line, probably in one of their pacelines every horse in the race would have a line that matchs up favorably for the win in the race. In my handicapping if a horses highest number is more than 3 races back, & or 5 or 6 months then i have to start evaluating his current form to see if he's just bad at this point in time or is he on the upswing again. Just like they about in sports how "potential" is just that, only potential i guess you can also say that in racing what a horse did "then" is no guarantee of what he'll do now. Well guys, hope this wasn't to long.
Frank
horsingaround is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 06:42 PM   #9
grahors
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 104
Frank,
Welcome to the board...you will enjoy. I agree with you, form must always be determined. Old pace lines, angles, whatever are really of little good or concern if the horse isn't in form or rounding into form (some sort of life last out, or next to last). I do use any line showing for the purpose of finding the horses inate ability and as a guage of it's class. A horse with good numbers back a few lines and some life just tickles my ivories.
Cecil
ps...no your post wasn't toooo long.........never to long
grahors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2008, 02:11 AM   #10
MIKE1121
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 131
A computer programs main purpose is to process information and lay it out in a manner which makes it easy for the user to see the results.Paceline selection is the key, this is one area where a program can be of some help if it has the capability to print out all the lines for a horse and then compare each line against one and another and the remainder of the field.The program can simulate the what ifs that we would otherwise have to do.


Ideally it is of much more value if you can have a program custom made for you and one which mimics YOUR thought processes eliminating the repetitiveness thought processes. We all have a given set of steps which we do over and over again when we break down a race why not have a computer program do these steps. When I do an update of my program I rarely am adding a new rating, most of the time I am just having the program do one more step in my handicapping, saving me time.


Mike.
MIKE1121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ted this is some very slick software you've developed Dallas4lr RDSS 1 12-22-2007 01:25 PM
Record keeping software chrisl General Discussion 3 10-12-2007 05:52 PM
Del06-25-06 Selections Using New Software partsnut Selections 0 06-25-2006 12:03 PM
Pha06-25-06 Selections Using New Software partsnut Selections 0 06-25-2006 11:28 AM
To all those getting free Validator and other Software here RichieP Velocity Programs 7 04-21-2006 04:05 AM


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:22 PM.