Go Back   Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up > General Discussion
Get RDSS
Google Site Search Get RDSS Sartin Library RDSS FAQs Conduct Register Site FAQ Members List Today's Posts

General Discussion General Horse Racing Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-24-2010, 11:57 PM   #1
classhandicapper
AlwNW3X
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 47
Track and Field Pace

Has anyone explored human track and field pace issues to try to apply some of the principles to their understanding of horses?

Is it generally believed that the best way for humans to produce their optimal final time is to use their energy evenly or is it preferable to go a little faster early and decelerate slightly at the end?
classhandicapper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2010, 03:38 PM   #2
lsosa54
Grade 1
 
lsosa54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NYC and San Diego
Posts: 627
Even as a human, I think it would depend on the distance and the makeup of the field you're matched up against. If you're talking cross country, then the nature of the course would have an influence as well. Of course, your level of fitness may also play a role.

I think all that women's track coaching experience was at the foundation of the Hat's approach.
lsosa54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2010, 05:41 PM   #3
For The Lead
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by classhandicapper View Post
Has anyone explored human track and field pace issues to try to apply some of the principles to their understanding of horses?

Is it generally believed that the best way for humans to produce their optimal final time is to use their energy evenly or is it preferable to go a little faster early and decelerate slightly at the end?
If I were training a horse for classical distances, I would want the horse to run evenly timed quarter miles. Quarter miles in 24 seconds.

At sprint distances this approach doesn't get the job done. After all, 24.0,48.0,1:12.0 doesn't win a lot of 6f races.

But once you reach 1 mile, you would now be at 1:36.0 and it's getting better.
8.5f = 1:42.0
9.0f = 1:48.0
9.5f = 1:54.0
10f = 2:00.0
12f = 2:24.0

I think my horse could win some races at those distances, with those times.
__________________
"It's suppose to be hard. If it was easy, everybody would do it." Jimmy Dugan, A League of Their Own
For The Lead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2010, 11:43 PM   #4
classhandicapper
AlwNW3X
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by For The Lead View Post
If I were training a horse for classical distances, I would want the horse to run evenly timed quarter miles. Quarter miles in 24 seconds.

At sprint distances this approach doesn't get the job done. After all, 24.0,48.0,1:12.0 doesn't win a lot of 6f races.

But once you reach 1 mile, you would now be at 1:36.0 and it's getting better.
8.5f = 1:42.0
9.0f = 1:48.0
9.5f = 1:54.0
10f = 2:00.0
12f = 2:24.0

I think my horse could win some races at those distances, with those times.
The interesting question to me is WHY 24 48 112 wouldn't get the job done if the other horses are 112 1/5 type horses that are running 22 3/5 46 2/5 up front.

I could see saying the second group is superior because if they were allowed to slow down early they could run faster than 112, but other than that a more even paced horse trailing the field shouldn't be impacted by what's going on in front of him UNLESS the jockey pushes him to run faster and get closer.
classhandicapper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2010, 02:06 AM   #5
For The Lead
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by classhandicapper View Post
The interesting question to me is WHY 24 48 112 wouldn't get the job done if the other horses are 112 1/5 type horses that are running 22 3/5 46 2/5 up front.

I could see saying the second group is superior because if they were allowed to slow down early they could run faster than 112, but other than that a more even paced horse trailing the field shouldn't be impacted by what's going on in front of him UNLESS the jockey pushes him to run faster and get closer.
Well, again, if I were training my horse for the classical distances, I'm sure it would be meeting like horses along the way and I doubt that I would win many 6 furlong races in a final time of 1:12.0 against like horses.
The whole idea is to be pointing the horse towards distances of a mile and more. As you can see from the times I projected out in my previous post based on 24 second quarters, this would be a formidable horse at distances of one mile or more.
__________________
"It's suppose to be hard. If it was easy, everybody would do it." Jimmy Dugan, A League of Their Own
For The Lead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2010, 06:27 PM   #6
Simon Rowlands
Maiden
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Britain
Posts: 1
A book came out in UK early this year which used studies of human biomechanics as an introduction to horse biomechanics.

It is called "Bioenergetics and Racehorse Ratings" and is written by Bob Wilkins, an engineer who uses some impressive maths to support his case.

Worth checking out, in my opinion.
Simon Rowlands is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2010, 09:28 PM   #7
Ted Craven
Grade 1
 
Ted Craven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 9,251
Bioenergetics and Racehorse Ratings

..

http://astore.amazon.com/sartinmetho...ail/0956424309
__________________

R
DSS -
Racing Decision Support System™
Ted Craven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2010, 10:30 AM   #8
gandalf380
Grade 1
 
gandalf380's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: central islip ny
Posts: 1,196
And for those who don't remember, Jim Bradshaw is in the Oklahoma track hall of fame as a coach. I have always thought that his knowledge of human runners helped give him an understanding of horses and the way they run races.
__________________
Check out my daily picks for Saratoga in the Saratoga Special
http://www.thisishorseracing.com
gandalf380 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2010, 03:33 PM   #9
classhandicapper
AlwNW3X
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 47
Thanks.
classhandicapper is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HANA 2010 Track Ratings fasteddy General Discussion 0 06-25-2010 06:20 PM
Major vs. Minor tracks Bill P General Discussion 109 04-05-2010 03:23 PM
projecting pace mikesal57 Matchup Discussion 40 12-18-2009 09:00 AM
Jim Bradshaw's 5 Step Approach to learning the Matchup RichieP Hat Check - How Can We Help You? 1 05-25-2009 09:52 AM
Slow early pace Tim Y Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum 7 02-23-2009 12:21 PM


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:34 AM.