TPR numbers - Pace and Cap

shoeless · 08-07-2011, 08:02 PM

Wonder if you did New Pace with the TPR numbers from RDSS how it would work out.

Ted Craven · 08-07-2011, 08:29 PM

Maybe one day we'll find out. I consider them reasonably similar to Total Energy (though less accurate) and you can see our initial tests of using Total Energy as a source of NP ratings (just a bit worse than Adjusted SR). For now, I think we have enough ratings to work with.

The interesting part will come in the next while from studies to improve NewPace by factoring in normal Matchup stuff and identifying the worst NP contender for finishing in Win/Place position - making it easier to go with 3 horses. Also, eliminating horses on recency and those at the wrong end of their form cycle.

Ted

Mr.Pagine · 08-07-2011, 09:34 PM

Ted,

I just did the 10th at Woodbine from today...... BINGO - nice job 16-1. I will continue to do the card, and let you know how I make out.

The exactor clicked as well on the top 3 VDC.

Too bad I was busy today ..... looks like I ncould have made some $$.

Happy Punting
Jon

partsnut · 08-08-2011, 07:00 AM

Ted:

Quote:

The interesting part will come in the next while from studies to improve NewPace by factoring in normal Matchup stuff and identifying the worst NP contender for finishing in Win/Place position - making it easier to go with 3 horses. Also, eliminating horses on recency and those at the wrong end of their form cycle.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ted, this next study is in my opinion is "critical" and if done correctly will bring RDSS to it best ever level and make it the most formidable tool on the market.
The basic Bradshaw match up concepts (1st & 3rd Fractions for dirt sprints and routes) using the top 4 contenders should do the trick. Always weight the 3rd fraction for Turf more so on then you would for dirt. I believe this fraction is considerably more important for turf then the first fraction, possibly 1.5 to 2 times more. This could be monitored by trial and error.
Ted, I believe you're on the right track. I am sure you will achieve major success in the near future.

08-07-2011, 08:02 PM	#1
shoeless Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 4,614	TPR numbers Wonder if you did New Pace with the TPR numbers from RDSS how it would work out.

08-07-2011, 08:29 PM	#2
Ted Craven Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada Posts: 9,242	Maybe one day we'll find out. I consider them reasonably similar to Total Energy (though less accurate) and you can see our initial tests of using Total Energy as a source of NP ratings (just a bit worse than Adjusted SR). For now, I think we have enough ratings to work with. The interesting part will come in the next while from studies to improve NewPace by factoring in normal Matchup stuff and identifying the worst NP contender for finishing in Win/Place position - making it easier to go with 3 horses. Also, eliminating horses on recency and those at the wrong end of their form cycle. Ted __________________ RDSS - Racing Decision Support System™

08-07-2011, 09:34 PM	#3
Mr.Pagine Happy Punting Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Toronto, Ontario Posts: 527	Well, Well..... first test race I did..... and Ted, I just did the 10th at Woodbine from today...... BINGO - nice job 16-1. I will continue to do the card, and let you know how I make out. The exactor clicked as well on the top 3 VDC. Too bad I was busy today ..... looks like I ncould have made some $$. Happy Punting Jon

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
EL 2.0 Questions , please	pktruckdriver	NewPace Discussion Forum (old)	11	07-12-2011 02:30 PM
WO Final Numbers	tfm	Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum	5	12-08-2009 05:01 PM
An alternative when numbers fail	chris	Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum	1	10-01-2009 10:13 PM
Wrong program numbers	clore1030	RDSS	2	01-14-2009 09:27 PM
$103.20	RichieP	RDSS	17	12-04-2008 07:12 AM