|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Google Site Search | Get RDSSGet RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
| Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...) Interactive Teaching & Learning - Race Conditions, Contenders, Pacelines, Advanced Concepts, Betting ... |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-22-2017, 04:27 PM
|
#5 |
|
Grade 1
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Valley Stream NY
Posts: 11,522
|
Hi Charlie. As far as the balance numbers I look at them last and if a horse has a balance over 8 I downgrade it. I have found most of the horses with balances over 8 are usually not in my top 4 anyway, but if it is I would move it to #5, unless the 5th tiered horse is saddled with form defects in which case I leave it 4th but it would not be a win bet for me.
Tim
__________________
Trust but verify |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Perception, Chaos Theory and Numbers | Because I Can Jim | Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum | 4 | 06-18-2013 07:53 PM |
| New Pace Numbers Breakdown | vderdak | NewPace Discussion Forum (old) | 6 | 04-28-2013 05:56 PM |
| Tampa Fun With Numbers | trotman | General Discussion | 0 | 08-06-2012 09:39 AM |
| Is lower balance number always better? | BJennet | Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum | 6 | 01-09-2010 02:38 PM |
| WO Final Numbers | tfm | Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum | 5 | 12-08-2009 06:01 PM |
|
Threaded Mode